QQH vs. XLK
Compare and contrast key facts about HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK).
QQH and XLK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQH is a passively managed fund by Howard Capital Management that tracks the performance of the HCM Defender 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2019. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both QQH and XLK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QQH or XLK.
Correlation
The correlation between QQH and XLK is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QQH vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QQH:
1.69
XLK:
1.08
QQH:
2.21
XLK:
1.53
QQH:
1.30
XLK:
1.20
QQH:
2.22
XLK:
1.41
QQH:
7.15
XLK:
4.85
QQH:
5.13%
XLK:
4.94%
QQH:
21.70%
XLK:
22.14%
QQH:
-41.87%
XLK:
-82.05%
QQH:
-3.82%
XLK:
-1.47%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQH achieves a 37.86% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 24.23% return.
QQH
37.86%
5.79%
12.65%
36.99%
19.05%
N/A
XLK
24.23%
2.72%
5.34%
23.85%
22.05%
20.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQH vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQH has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QQH vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QQH vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
QQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than XLK's 0.64% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.64% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% | 1.75% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
QQH vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQH drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQH and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QQH vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) at 5.67%. This indicates that QQH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.