QQH vs. BOTZ
QQH (HCM Defender 100 Index ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the HCM Defender 100 Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQH returned 12.07%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQH charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
QQH vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQH achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 1.13% return.
QQH
- 1D
- -4.16%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 4.72%
- 1Y
- 28.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.07%
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 20.00%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- —
QQH vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF | 6.74% | 15.66% | 33.64% | 48.05% | -39.60% | 37.52% | 41.71% | 15.09% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 1.13% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 12.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQH and BOTZ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019 | 0.75 |
The correlation between QQH and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQH vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
QQH
BOTZ
QQH vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQH | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.15 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.04 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 3.34 | +1.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQH vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQH drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQH and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQH | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.87% | -55.54% | +13.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -19.34% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.84% | -29.02% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.87% | -55.54% | +13.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.53% | -11.99% | +4.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.87% | -18.27% | +5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.08% | 6.01% | +0.07% |
Volatility
QQH vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) has a higher volatility of 11.82% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 10.19%. This indicates that QQH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQH | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.82% | 10.19% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.82% | 20.13% | -2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.13% | 25.54% | -2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 27.03% | -5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.00% | 25.83% | -0.83% |
QQH vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQH has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQH vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
QQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than BOTZ's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.65% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF | 0.20% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQH and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQH has higher volatility (11.82%) compared to BOTZ (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQH dropped -41.87% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 5-year performance, QQH leads with 12.07% vs 1.10% for BOTZ. On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 10.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQH has performed better with a 12.07% return vs 1.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for QQH.
BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.20% for QQH.
QQH is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. QQH tracks HCM Defender 100 Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Howard Capital Management and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for QQH and 0.68% for BOTZ.
QQH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQH and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer