QQDN vs. QLD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QQDN (ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - QQDN is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index, while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.89, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

QQDN vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQDN achieves a -17.46% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 40.66% return.

QQDN

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -6.55%
• YTD: -17.46%
• 6M: -13.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QLD

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 17.34%
• YTD: 40.66%
• 6M: 36.42%
• 1Y: 82.72%
• 3Y*: 49.60%
• 5Y*: 25.50%
• 10Y*: 35.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQDN vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQDN ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega	-17.46%	-34.14%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	40.66%	27.73%

Correlation

The correlation between QQDN and QLD is -0.89, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	-0.89

Return for Risk

QQDN vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 70
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 68
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQDN vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQDN	QLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.21	0.59	-1.81

Drawdowns

QQDN vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQDN drawdown since its inception was -50.19%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQDN and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQDN	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.19%	-83.13%	+32.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-25.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-42.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.00%	-1.50%	-45.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.23%	-18.17%	-12.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQDN	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.93%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.08%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.51%	31.84%	+6.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.51%	44.72%	-6.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.51%	44.55%	-6.04%

QQDN vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQDN and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

QQDN vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

QQDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than QLD's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.12%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%
QQDN ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega	4.93%	3.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQDN and QLD in my portfolio?

QQDN and QLD have a correlation of -0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQDN or QLD?

Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQDN or QLD?

QQDN and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQDN or QLD?

QQDN has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.

What is the main difference between QQDN and QLD?

QQDN is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. QQDN tracks Nasdaq-100 Mega Index, while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).