QQDN vs. SH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QQDN (ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds from ProShares - QQDN tracks the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index while SH tracks the S&P 500 Index (-100% daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQDN returned -33.23% vs -13.19% for SH. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QQDN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SH.

Performance

QQDN vs. SH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQDN achieves a -13.18% return, which is significantly lower than SH's -6.65% return.

QQDN

• 1D: -5.15%
• 1M: -7.09%
• 6M: -15.46%
• YTD: -13.18%
• 1Y: -33.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -39.24%

SH

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 0.12%
• 6M: -5.73%
• YTD: -6.65%
• 1Y: -13.19%
• 3Y*: -10.94%
• 5Y*: -8.01%
• 10Y*: -12.47%
• ALL TIME*: -11.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQDN ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega	$29.10K	$31.97K	$57.01K
SH ProShares Short S&P500	$271.72M	$244.09M	$301.56M

QQDN vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQDN ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega	-13.18%	-34.51%
SH ProShares Short S&P500	-6.65%	-9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between QQDN and SH is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025	0.84

The correlation between QQDN and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQDN vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQDN

QQDN Risk / Return Rank: 4
QQDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
QQDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
QQDN Omega Ratio Rank: 4
QQDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
QQDN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

SH

SH Risk / Return Rank: 2
SH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SH Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
SH Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQDN vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQDN	SH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.70	-0.92	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.87	-1.29	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	0.86	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.68	-0.73	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.18	-1.30	+0.12

QQDN vs. SH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQDN Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is comparable to the SH Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQDN and SH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQDN vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQDN drawdown since its inception was -50.19%, smaller than the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQDN and SH.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQDN	SH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.19%	-94.66%	+44.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.68%	-16.06%	-27.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-38.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.53%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.25%	-94.54%	+50.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.57%	-67.93%	+36.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.92%	9.03%	+15.89%

Volatility

QQDN vs. SH - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) has a higher volatility of 14.41% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 3.51%. This indicates that QQDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQDN	SH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.41%	3.51%	+10.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.99%	10.08%	+22.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.40%	12.81%	+29.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.84%	16.96%	+23.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.84%	18.02%	+22.82%

QQDN vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQDN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQDN vs. SH - Dividend Comparison

QQDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, more than SH's 4.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QQDN ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega	5.67%	3.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SH ProShares Short S&P500	4.19%	4.49%	6.20%	5.37%	1.08%	0.00%	0.16%	1.76%	1.01%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQDN and SH in my portfolio?

QQDN and SH have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQDN or SH?

QQDN has higher volatility (14.41%) compared to SH (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQDN dropped -50.19% vs SH's -94.66%.

Which ETF is better, QQDN or SH?

On 1-year performance, SH leads with -13.19% vs -33.23% for QQDN. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQDN or SH?

Over the 1-year period, SH has performed better with a -13.19% return vs -33.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQDN or SH?

SH is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQDN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQDN or SH?

QQDN has the higher dividend yield at 5.67%, compared with 4.19% for SH.

What is the main difference between QQDN and SH?

QQDN tracks Nasdaq-100 Mega Index, while SH tracks S&P 500 Index (-100% daily). Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQDN and 0.89% for SH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.