QQDN vs. SARK
QQDN (ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. QQDN is passively managed, while SARK is actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQDN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.
Performance
QQDN vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQDN achieves a -17.46% return, which is significantly lower than SARK's -9.16% return.
QQDN
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- YTD
- -17.46%
- 6M
- -13.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- -9.16%
- 6M
- -2.48%
- 1Y
- -35.40%
- 3Y*
- -31.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQDN vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQDN ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega | -17.46% | -34.14% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -9.16% | -23.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQDN and SARK is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQDN vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
QQDN
SARK
QQDN vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQDN | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.21 | -0.25 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
QQDN vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQDN drawdown since its inception was -50.19%, smaller than the maximum SARK drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQDN and SARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQDN | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.19% | -81.07% | +30.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -40.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -74.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.00% | -79.95% | +32.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.23% | -46.49% | +16.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.56% | — |
Volatility
QQDN vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQDN | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.51% | 35.98% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.51% | 56.23% | -17.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.51% | 56.23% | -17.72% |
QQDN vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQDN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQDN vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
QQDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than SARK's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQDN ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega | 4.93% | 3.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.10% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQDN and SARK have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQDN.
QQDN has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 3.10% for SARK.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQDN and 0.75% for SARK.
Find the right allocation for QQDN and SARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer