PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QQCC.TO vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QQCC.TO vs. CIBR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

QQCC.TO (Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQCC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQCC.TO returned 0.45%/yr vs 19.01%/yr for CIBR. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QQCC.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

QQCC.TO vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QQCC.TO is traded in CAD, while CIBR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CIBR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCC.TO achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 31.84% return. Over the past 10 years, QQCC.TO has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 0.45%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 19.01% annualized return.

QQCC.TO

1D
0.82%
1M
-5.11%
6M
10.65%
YTD
11.50%
1Y
22.66%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
-0.73%
10Y*
0.45%
ALL TIME*
-1.39%

CIBR

1D
1.83%
1M
-0.19%
6M
35.94%
YTD
31.84%
1Y
30.51%
3Y*
27.61%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
19.01%
ALL TIME*
16.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

CIBR

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
CA$172.37MCA$190.52MCA$194.92M

QQCC.TO

Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
CA$861.14KCA$855.52KCA$1.23M

QQCC.TO vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF		11.50%11.64%33.42%35.92%-55.98%5.24%-6.26%12.55%-18.79%15.14%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF		31.84%7.90%28.22%36.39%-21.79%19.62%46.96%23.22%10.01%10.58%

Correlation

The correlation between QQCC.TO and CIBR is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.42

The correlation between QQCC.TO and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (10 years) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQCC.TO vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
QQCC.TO
CIBR

Technology

58.6%
94.9%

Communication Services

14.3%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.4%

-

Healthcare

3.7%

-

Industrials

2.6%
3.0%

Utilities

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QQCC.TO
58.6%
CIBR
94.9%

Communication Services

QQCC.TO
14.3%
CIBR
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QQCC.TO
11.4%
CIBR

-

Consumer Defensive

QQCC.TO
6.4%
CIBR

-

Healthcare

QQCC.TO
3.7%
CIBR

-

Industrials

QQCC.TO
2.6%
CIBR
3.0%

Utilities

QQCC.TO
1.2%
CIBR

-

Basic Materials

QQCC.TO
1.0%
CIBR

-

Energy

QQCC.TO
0.5%
CIBR

-

Financial Services

QQCC.TO
0.2%
CIBR

-

Real Estate

QQCC.TO
0.1%
CIBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF

Often compared with QQCC.TO:
QQCC.TO vs. QQCL.TOQQCC.TO vs. QQC.TOQQCC.TO vs. QQQIQQCC.TO vs. QQQQQCC.TO vs. XQQ.TOQQCC.TO vs. NVDA.TOQQCC.TO vs. JEPQ.TO
Often compared with CIBR:
CIBR vs. HACKCIBR vs. BUGCIBR vs. IHAKCIBR vs. CYBR.TOCIBR vs. QQQCIBR vs. WCBRCIBR vs. CRWD

Return for Risk

QQCC.TO vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
QQCC.TO
QQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQCC.TO vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QQCC.TOCIBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.29
1.10

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.83
1.64

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.20

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.24

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.45

2.81

+4.64

QQCC.TO vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCC.TO and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQCC.TO vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -67.77%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -30.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCC.TO and CIBR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QQCC.TOCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.77%

-30.24%

-37.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-23.24%

+12.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.24%

-23.24%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.13%

-29.83%

-29.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.91%

-30.24%

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.22%

-4.01%

-22.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.23%

-7.93%

-20.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

10.26%

-7.47%

Volatility

QQCC.TO vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) is 6.29%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that QQCC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QQCC.TOCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

7.21%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.68%

22.31%

-8.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.07%

26.15%

-10.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.52%

25.83%

+2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.38%

24.44%

-1.06%

QQCC.TO vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQCC.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQCC.TO vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

QQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.34%, more than CIBR's 0.43% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF		0.43%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF		11.34%11.27%9.84%11.79%11.06%2.58%2.92%3.14%3.96%3.00%3.36%4.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

QQCC.TO and CIBR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for QQCC.TO.

QQCC.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. QQCC.TO tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for QQCC.TO and 0.60% for CIBR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQCC.TO and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer