QQCC.TO vs. QQQI
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI).
QQCC.TO and QQQI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQCC.TO is managed by Global X. It was launched on Sep 13, 2011. QQQI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Jan 29, 2024.
Performance
QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | -3.61% | 11.64% | 27.12% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | -3.12% | 13.18% | 28.63% |
Different Trading Currencies
QQCC.TO is traded in CAD, while QQQI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQCC.TO achieves a -3.61% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's -3.12% return.
QQCC.TO
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -3.61%
- 6M
- -1.75%
- 1Y
- 15.14%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
QQQI
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- YTD
- -3.12%
- 6M
- -1.70%
- 1Y
- 16.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQCC.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QQCC.TO vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
QQCC.TO
QQQI
QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQCC.TO | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 0.87 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 1.33 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.20 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 1.55 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 5.51 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQCC.TO | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 0.87 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 1.01 | -1.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQCC.TO and QQQI is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
QQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.12%, less than QQQI's 15.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | 11.12% | 11.27% | 9.89% | 11.85% | 11.04% | 5.15% | 5.84% | 6.31% | 7.90% | 6.01% | 6.73% | 8.89% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 15.05% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.13%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -19.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCC.TO and QQQI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQCC.TO | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.13% | -20.00% | -80.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -11.46% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -6.66% | -93.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -99.78% | -2.31% | -97.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 2.52% | +0.63% |
Volatility
QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) is 5.36%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 6.00%. This indicates that QQCC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQCC.TO | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 6.00% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.43% | 11.13% | -0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.26% | 19.41% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 17.12% | +0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 17.12% | +0.18% |