QQCC.TO vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQCC.TO (Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. Over the past year, QQCC.TO returned 35.05% vs 32.09% for QQQI. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQCC.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

QQCC.TO is traded in CAD, while QQQI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCC.TO achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 14.88% return.

QQCC.TO

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 10.18%
• YTD: 16.94%
• 6M: 14.76%
• 1Y: 35.05%
• 3Y*: 23.56%
• 5Y*: 15.67%
• 10Y*: 10.87%

QQQI

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 9.04%
• YTD: 14.88%
• 6M: 12.49%
• 1Y: 32.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	16.94%	11.64%	27.12%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	14.88%	13.18%	28.63%

Correlation

The correlation between QQCC.TO and QQQI is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024	0.88

The correlation between QQCC.TO and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQCC.TO	QQQI
Technology	50.5%	53.3%
Communication Services	16.1%	15.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.6%	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	8.6%	7.7%
Healthcare	5.1%	4.3%
Industrials	3.3%	3.3%
Utilities	1.5%	1.5%
Basic Materials	1.3%	1.2%
Energy	0.7%	0.7%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.3%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QQCC.TO vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQCC.TO

QQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
QQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
QQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 68
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQCC.TO	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	2.50	+0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	3.30	+0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.47	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.32	3.49	+0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.04	12.27	+3.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCC.TO and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQCC.TO	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.76	2.50	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	1.48	-1.48

Drawdowns

QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -19.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCC.TO and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQCC.TO	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.70%	-19.81%	-16.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.15%	-9.24%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.37%	-2.67%	-5.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	2.62%	-0.43%

Volatility

QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 2.66%. This indicates that QQCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQCC.TO	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	2.66%	+1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.03%	9.71%	+0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.78%	12.91%	-0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.58%	16.70%	+0.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.29%	16.70%	+0.59%

QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQCC.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQCC.TO vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

QQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.48%, less than QQQI's 13.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	10.48%	11.27%	9.89%	11.85%	11.04%	5.15%	5.84%	6.31%	7.90%	6.01%	6.73%	8.89%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.19%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQCC.TO and QQQI in my portfolio?

QQCC.TO and QQQI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQCC.TO or QQQI?

On fees, QQCC.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQCC.TO or QQQI?

QQCC.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

What is the main difference between QQCC.TO and QQQI?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for QQCC.TO and 0.68% for QQQI.