QPX vs. RFDA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QPX returned 13.04%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for RFDA. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QPX charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.

Performance

QPX vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QPX having a 10.87% return and RFDA slightly higher at 11.40%.

QPX

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 7.22%
• YTD: 10.87%
• 6M: 11.56%
• 1Y: 32.39%
• 3Y*: 21.61%
• 5Y*: 13.04%
• 10Y*: —

RFDA

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 11.40%
• 6M: 12.25%
• 1Y: 29.49%
• 3Y*: 19.19%
• 5Y*: 13.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QPX vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF	10.87%	24.12%	17.28%	44.63%	-30.90%	22.29%	0.38%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	11.40%	16.42%	20.12%	16.98%	-8.58%	25.94%	0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QPX and RFDA is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020	0.82

The correlation between QPX and RFDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

QPX vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QPX	RFDA
Technology	49.8%	19.9%
Consumer Cyclical	25.6%	7.0%
Communication Services	14.9%	8.8%
Real Estate	6.4%	5.0%
Industrials	1.0%	8.9%
Financial Services	0.9%	14.7%
Healthcare	0.6%	8.8%
Energy	0.3%	12.5%
Basic Materials	0.3%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	7.6%
Utilities	0.1%	5.0%

Return for Risk

QPX vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QPX

QPX Risk / Return Rank: 65
QPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
QPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QPX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
QPX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

RFDA

RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 83
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 79
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QPX vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QPX	RFDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.55	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	3.52	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.47	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	5.44	-2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.19	19.87	-8.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QPX vs. RFDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the RFDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QPX and RFDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QPX	RFDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.55	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.84	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.79	-0.12

Drawdowns

QPX vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, roughly equal to the maximum RFDA drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and RFDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QPX	RFDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.74%	-34.60%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.56%	-5.45%	-6.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.89%	-19.35%	+1.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.74%	-19.35%	-15.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.92%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.07%	-3.74%	-4.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	1.49%	+1.41%

Volatility

QPX vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 2.66%. This indicates that QPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QPX	RFDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	2.66%	+1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.01%	8.47%	+2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.97%	11.64%	+2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.93%	15.73%	+4.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.99%	16.85%	+3.14%

QPX vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

QPX vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	1.77%	1.89%	2.23%	2.68%	3.57%	1.44%	1.62%	1.87%	2.44%	1.90%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QPX and RFDA in my portfolio?

QPX and RFDA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QPX or RFDA?

QPX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to RFDA (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QPX dropped -34.74% vs RFDA's -34.60%.

Which ETF is better, QPX or RFDA?

On 5-year performance, RFDA leads with 13.17% vs 13.04% for QPX. On fees, RFDA is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QPX or RFDA?

Over the 5-year period, RFDA has performed better with a 13.17% return vs 13.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QPX or RFDA?

RFDA is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QPX or RFDA?

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.

What is the main difference between QPX and RFDA?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 0.52% for RFDA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.