QPX vs. IQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) and IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QPX returned 13.04%/yr vs 22.22%/yr for IQM. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QPX charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IQM.

Performance

QPX vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QPX achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 40.18% return.

QPX

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 7.22%
• YTD: 10.87%
• 6M: 11.56%
• 1Y: 32.39%
• 3Y*: 21.61%
• 5Y*: 13.04%
• 10Y*: —

IQM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 11.94%
• YTD: 40.18%
• 6M: 38.57%
• 1Y: 75.07%
• 3Y*: 37.62%
• 5Y*: 22.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QPX vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF	10.87%	24.12%	17.28%	44.63%	-30.90%	22.29%	0.38%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	40.18%	30.76%	31.03%	41.06%	-33.36%	25.18%	1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between QPX and IQM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020	0.90

The correlation between QPX and IQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

QPX vs. IQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QPX	IQM
Technology	49.8%	65.9%
Consumer Cyclical	25.6%	4.1%
Communication Services	14.9%	2.1%
Real Estate	6.4%	-
Industrials	1.0%	19.9%
Financial Services	0.9%	-
Healthcare	0.6%	1.1%
Energy	0.3%	2.7%
Basic Materials	0.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	-
Utilities	0.1%	3.3%

Return for Risk

QPX vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QPX

QPX Risk / Return Rank: 65
QPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
QPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QPX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
QPX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

IQM

IQM Risk / Return Rank: 78
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QPX vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QPX	IQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.67	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	3.11	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.43	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	5.13	-2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.19	16.79	-5.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QPX vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QPX and IQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QPX	IQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.67	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.77	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.96	-0.29

Drawdowns

QPX vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and IQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QPX	IQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.74%	-44.91%	+10.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.56%	-14.71%	+3.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.89%	-30.42%	+12.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.74%	-44.91%	+10.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.37%	-0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.07%	-12.25%	+4.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	4.49%	-1.59%

Volatility

QPX vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) is 4.16%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that QPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QPX	IQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	9.20%	-5.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.01%	22.92%	-11.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.97%	28.27%	-14.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.93%	28.91%	-8.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.99%	30.72%	-10.73%

QPX vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QPX vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

Neither QPX nor IQM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.01%
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QPX and IQM in my portfolio?

QPX and IQM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QPX or IQM?

IQM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to QPX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QPX dropped -34.74% vs IQM's -44.91%.

Which ETF is better, QPX or IQM?

On 5-year performance, IQM leads with 22.22% vs 13.04% for QPX. On fees, IQM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QPX has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QPX or IQM?

Over the 5-year period, IQM has performed better with a 22.22% return vs 13.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QPX or IQM?

IQM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QPX or IQM?

QPX and IQM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QPX and IQM?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 0.50% for IQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.