QPX vs. EATZ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QPX charges 1.46%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

QPX vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QPX

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -0.23%
• 6M: 5.39%
• YTD: 7.94%
• 1Y: 23.19%
• 3Y*: 18.77%
• 5Y*: 10.80%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.31%

EATZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF	$71.42K	$154.86K	$125.10K

QPX vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF	7.94%	24.12%	17.28%	44.63%	-30.90%	14.38%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between QPX and EATZ is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between QPX and EATZ has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

QPX vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QPX

QPX Risk / Return Rank: 56
QPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QPX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
QPX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QPX vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QPX	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.07	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	QPX	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.29%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.94%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.29%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QPX	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.27%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.92%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.93%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.18%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.01%	—	—

QPX vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

QPX vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QPX and EATZ in my portfolio?

QPX and EATZ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QPX or EATZ?

On fees, EATZ is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QPX or EATZ?

EATZ is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QPX or EATZ?

EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.

What is the main difference between QPX and EATZ?

QPX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EATZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 1.00% for EATZ.