QPX vs. DWAW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) and DWAW (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QPX returned 10.80%/yr vs 7.70%/yr for DWAW. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QPX charges 1.46%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for DWAW.

Performance

QPX vs. DWAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QPX achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than DWAW's 13.67% return.

QPX

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -0.23%
• 6M: 5.39%
• YTD: 7.94%
• 1Y: 23.19%
• 3Y*: 18.77%
• 5Y*: 10.80%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.31%

DWAW

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: -0.10%
• 6M: 9.91%
• YTD: 13.67%
• 1Y: 22.65%
• 3Y*: 17.68%
• 5Y*: 7.70%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF	$28.36K	$26.23K	$94.81K
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF	$71.42K	$154.86K	$125.10K

QPX vs. DWAW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF	7.94%	24.12%	17.28%	44.63%	-30.90%	22.29%	-0.31%
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF	13.67%	10.85%	18.48%	11.18%	-17.80%	3.49%	-1.09%

Correlation

The correlation between QPX and DWAW is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2020	0.84

The correlation between QPX and DWAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QPX vs. DWAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QPX

QPX Risk / Return Rank: 56
QPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QPX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
QPX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

DWAW

DWAW Risk / Return Rank: 51
DWAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
DWAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
DWAW Omega Ratio Rank: 49
DWAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
DWAW Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QPX vs. DWAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QPX	DWAW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.31	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	1.86	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.24	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	1.96	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.07	7.28	-0.21

QPX vs. DWAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the DWAW Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QPX and DWAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QPX vs. DWAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, which is greater than DWAW's maximum drawdown of -31.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and DWAW.

Drawdown Indicators

	QPX	DWAW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.74%	-31.55%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.56%	-11.58%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.89%	-22.91%	+5.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.74%	-28.43%	-6.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.29%	-3.29%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.94%	-10.77%	+2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.29%	3.12%	+0.17%

Volatility

QPX vs. DWAW - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) at 4.84%. This indicates that QPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QPX	DWAW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.27%	4.84%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.92%	14.77%	-1.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.93%	17.39%	-1.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.18%	19.28%	+0.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.01%	24.45%	-4.44%

QPX vs. DWAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than DWAW's 1.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

QPX vs. DWAW - Dividend Comparison

QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DWAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF	0.67%	0.76%	0.00%	1.70%	0.53%	1.45%	0.16%
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QPX and DWAW in my portfolio?

QPX and DWAW have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QPX or DWAW?

QPX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to DWAW (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QPX dropped -34.74% vs DWAW's -31.55%.

Which ETF is better, QPX or DWAW?

On 5-year performance, QPX leads with 10.80% vs 7.70% for DWAW. On fees, DWAW is cheaper at 1.24% per year. On volatility, DWAW has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QPX or DWAW?

Over the 5-year period, QPX has performed better with a 10.80% return vs 7.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QPX or DWAW?

DWAW is cheaper with a 1.24% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QPX or DWAW?

DWAW has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.

What is the main difference between QPX and DWAW?

Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 1.24% for DWAW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.