QPX vs. BBUS
QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QPX is actively managed, while BBUS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QPX returned 13.04%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QPX charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
QPX vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QPX having a 10.87% return and BBUS slightly lower at 10.60%.
QPX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 32.39%
- 3Y*
- 21.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
QPX vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 10.87% | 24.12% | 17.28% | 44.63% | -30.90% | 22.29% | 0.38% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between QPX and BBUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between QPX and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
QPX vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QPX
BBUS
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
QPX
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
QPX
BBUS
Communication Services
QPX
BBUS
Real Estate
QPX
BBUS
Industrials
QPX
BBUS
Financial Services
QPX
BBUS
Healthcare
QPX
BBUS
Energy
QPX
BBUS
Basic Materials
QPX
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
QPX
BBUS
Utilities
QPX
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QPX vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
QPX
BBUS
QPX vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QPX | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.42 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 3.00 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.19 | 13.76 | -2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QPX | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.33 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.79 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.84 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
QPX vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QPX | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -35.35% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -9.21% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -19.01% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -25.46% | -9.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.74% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.07% | -5.46% | -2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.00% | +0.90% |
Volatility
QPX vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that QPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QPX | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 2.88% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 8.96% | +2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 11.87% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 17.03% | +2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 19.59% | +0.40% |
QPX vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
QPX vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, QPX and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QPX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QPX dropped -34.74% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 13.04% for QPX. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 13.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 0.02% for BBUS.
QPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QPX and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer