QPX vs. AADR
QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) and AADR (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while AADR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QPX returned 13.04%/yr vs 6.23%/yr for AADR. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QPX charges 1.46%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for AADR.
Performance
QPX vs. AADR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QPX achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly higher than AADR's -1.56% return.
QPX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 32.39%
- 3Y*
- 21.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
AADR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 9.54%
- 3Y*
- 22.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
QPX vs. AADR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 10.87% | 24.12% | 17.28% | 44.63% | -30.90% | 22.29% | 0.38% |
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | -1.56% | 25.63% | 24.58% | 18.67% | -22.93% | 6.48% | 0.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between QPX and AADR is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020 | 0.65 |
The correlation between QPX and AADR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
QPX vs. AADR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QPX
AADR
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
QPX
AADR
Consumer Cyclical
QPX
AADR
Communication Services
QPX
AADR
Real Estate
QPX
AADR
-
Industrials
QPX
AADR
Financial Services
QPX
AADR
Healthcare
QPX
AADR
Energy
QPX
AADR
Basic Materials
QPX
AADR
Consumer Defensive
QPX
AADR
Utilities
QPX
AADR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QPX vs. AADR — Risk / Return Rank
QPX
AADR
QPX vs. AADR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QPX | AADR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.10 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 0.50 | +2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.19 | 1.40 | +9.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QPX | AADR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 0.45 | +1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.29 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.43 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
QPX vs. AADR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, smaller than the maximum AADR drawdown of -45.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and AADR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QPX | AADR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -45.01% | +10.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -19.30% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -20.61% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -34.80% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -12.54% | +11.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.07% | -9.40% | +1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 6.82% | -3.92% |
Volatility
QPX vs. AADR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) is 4.16%, while AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that QPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AADR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QPX | AADR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 6.34% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 17.55% | -6.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 21.33% | -7.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 21.68% | -1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 22.20% | -2.21% |
QPX vs. AADR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than AADR's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
QPX vs. AADR - Dividend Comparison
QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | 0.54% | 0.49% | 1.33% | 0.74% | 3.65% | 0.92% | 0.11% | 0.58% | 0.75% | 0.74% | 0.58% | 0.81% |
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QPX and AADR have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AADR has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to QPX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QPX dropped -34.74% vs AADR's -45.01%.
On 5-year performance, QPX leads with 13.04% vs 6.23% for AADR. On fees, AADR is cheaper at 1.10% per year. On volatility, QPX has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QPX has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 6.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AADR is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.
AADR has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.
QPX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AADR is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 1.10% for AADR.
QPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QPX and AADR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer