AADR vs. BRK-B
AADR (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF) is Global Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, AADR returned 8.54%/yr vs 13.57%/yr for BRK-B. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AADR vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AADR achieves a -3.26% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, AADR has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 8.54%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 13.57% annualized return.
AADR
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- 6M
- -9.51%
- YTD
- -3.26%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.67%
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 8.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 13.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $362.44K | $225.16K | $192.53K | |
| $2.04B | $2.04B | $2.42B |
AADR vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | -3.26% | 25.63% | 24.58% | 18.67% | -22.93% | 6.48% | 13.13% | 35.35% | -31.55% | 47.76% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 1.77% | 10.89% | 27.09% | 15.46% | 3.31% | 28.95% | 2.37% | 10.93% | 3.01% | 21.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between AADR and BRK-B is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2010 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AADR and BRK-B has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AADR vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
AADR
BRK-B
AADR vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AADR | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.11 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 0.90 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.75 | 1.88 | -1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AADR vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AADR drawdown since its inception was -45.01%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADR and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AADR | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.01% | -53.86% | +8.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.30% | -9.42% | -9.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.61% | -14.95% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.80% | -26.58% | -8.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.01% | -29.57% | -15.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.06% | -5.24% | -8.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -11.06% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.93% | 4.49% | +4.44% |
Volatility
AADR vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 4.59%. This indicates that AADR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AADR | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 4.59% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.48% | 11.13% | +7.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.08% | 14.79% | +7.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 17.12% | +4.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.15% | 19.42% | +2.73% |
Dividends
AADR vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
AADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | 0.84% | 0.49% | 1.33% | 0.74% | 3.65% | 0.92% | 0.11% | 0.58% | 0.75% | 0.74% | 0.58% | 0.81% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AADR and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AADR has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to BRK-B (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADR dropped -45.01% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.
BRK-B currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AADR and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer