PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AADR vs. VT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


AADRVT
YTD Return18.59%18.67%
1Y Return40.45%33.99%
3Y Return (Ann)2.13%6.55%
5Y Return (Ann)7.80%12.09%
10Y Return (Ann)7.57%9.83%
Sharpe Ratio2.152.73
Sortino Ratio2.893.73
Omega Ratio1.371.49
Calmar Ratio1.362.20
Martin Ratio12.3618.42
Ulcer Index3.16%1.78%
Daily Std Dev18.18%12.03%
Max Drawdown-45.01%-50.27%
Current Drawdown-0.12%-0.10%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between AADR and VT is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

AADR vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AADR having a 18.59% return and VT slightly higher at 18.67%. Over the past 10 years, AADR has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 7.57%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.83% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
9.69%
14.82%
AADR
VT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AADR vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AADR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio.


AADR
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
Expense ratio chart for AADR: current value at 1.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.10%
Expense ratio chart for VT: current value at 0.07% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.07%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AADR vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AADR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AADR, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.15
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AADR, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AADR, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AADR, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.36
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AADR, currently valued at 12.36, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.36
VT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VT, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.83
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VT, currently valued at 3.86, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.86
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VT, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.52
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VT, currently valued at 2.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.28
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VT, currently valued at 19.24, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0019.24

AADR vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AADR Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AADR and VT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
2.15
2.83
AADR
VT

Dividends

AADR vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

AADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than VT's 1.84% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AADR
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
1.64%0.74%3.65%0.92%0.11%0.58%0.75%0.74%0.58%0.81%0.49%0.34%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.84%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%2.44%2.06%

Drawdowns

AADR vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AADR drawdown since its inception was -45.01%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADR and VT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-0.12%
-0.10%
AADR
VT

Volatility

AADR vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 2.62%. This indicates that AADR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
5.17%
2.62%
AADR
VT