QMMY vs. CIBR
QMMY (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QMMY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. QMMY is actively managed, while CIBR is passively managed. Over the past year, QMMY returned 10.88% vs 36.34% for CIBR. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QMMY charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
QMMY vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QMMY achieves a 5.24% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 36.91% return.
QMMY
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 10.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.42%
CIBR
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.02%
- 6M
- 47.04%
- YTD
- 36.91%
- 1Y
- 36.34%
- 3Y*
- 29.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.43%
- 10Y*
- 18.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $119.91M | $138.30M | $142.80M | |
| $1.04M | $890.31K | $2.09M |
QMMY vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QMMY FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May | 5.24% | 15.80% | 8.37% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 36.91% | 13.06% | 13.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between QMMY and CIBR is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2024 | 0.66 |
The correlation between QMMY and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QMMY vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
QMMY
CIBR
QMMY vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May (QMMY) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QMMY | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.25 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 1.66 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.13 | 3.84 | +6.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QMMY vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMMY drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMMY and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QMMY | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.82% | -33.89% | +21.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.86% | -21.99% | +17.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.38% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.18% | -8.61% | +7.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 9.49% | -8.41% |
Volatility
QMMY vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May (QMMY) is 3.49%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that QMMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QMMY | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 8.29% | -4.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.22% | 22.41% | -15.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.13% | 26.26% | -18.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.12% | 25.38% | -14.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.12% | 23.68% | -12.56% |
QMMY vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QMMY has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
QMMY vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
QMMY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.40% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
QMMY FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QMMY and CIBR have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to QMMY (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMMY dropped -12.82% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 1-year performance, CIBR leads with 36.34% vs 10.88% for QMMY. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QMMY has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 36.34% return vs 10.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMMY.
CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.00% for QMMY.
QMMY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QMMY and 0.60% for CIBR.
CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QMMY and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer