QMMY vs. QB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QMMY (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QMMY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust, while QB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. QMMY is actively managed, while QB is passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QMMY charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.

Performance

QMMY vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May (QMMY) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMMY achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 10.47% return.

QMMY

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 6.16%
• 6M: 6.79%
• 1Y: 15.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QB

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMMY vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QMMY FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May	6.16%	7.04%
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	10.47%	5.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QMMY and QB is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.70

Return for Risk

QMMY vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMMY

QMMY Risk / Return Rank: 85
QMMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QMMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QMMY Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QMMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
QMMY Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMMY vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May (QMMY) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QMMY	QB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.83	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.17	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	24.34	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QMMY	QB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.40	3.17	-1.77

Drawdowns

QMMY vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMMY drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMMY and QB.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMMY	QB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.82%	-1.83%	-10.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.30%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.13%	-0.34%	-0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.65%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QMMY	QB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.25%	5.75%	+0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.87%	5.75%	+5.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.87%	5.75%	+5.12%

QMMY vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMMY has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMMY vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

QMMY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

Position	TTM	2025
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.62%	0.48%
QMMY FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMMY and QB in my portfolio?

QMMY and QB have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QMMY or QB?

On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QMMY or QB?

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QMMY or QB?

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for QMMY.

What is the main difference between QMMY and QB?

QMMY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QB is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QMMY and 0.58% for QB.