QLVE vs. LVHD
QLVE (FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLVE is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index, while LVHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLVE returned 6.79%/yr vs 7.56%/yr for LVHD. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QLVE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.
Performance
QLVE vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLVE achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 13.28% return.
QLVE
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- 6M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 11.95%
- 1Y
- 22.18%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHD
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 11.64%
- YTD
- 13.28%
- 1Y
- 14.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
QLVE vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 11.95% | 21.87% | 10.17% | 8.53% | -13.10% | 0.90% | 4.16% | 4.77% |
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.28% | 7.50% | 10.18% | -0.95% | -1.82% | 26.90% | -1.28% | 6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLVE and LVHD is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019 | 0.34 |
The correlation between QLVE and LVHD shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QLVE vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLVE
LVHD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Technology
QLVE
LVHD
Financial Services
QLVE
LVHD
Communication Services
QLVE
LVHD
Consumer Cyclical
QLVE
LVHD
Industrials
QLVE
LVHD
Consumer Defensive
QLVE
LVHD
Healthcare
QLVE
LVHD
Energy
QLVE
LVHD
Utilities
QLVE
LVHD
Basic Materials
QLVE
LVHD
-
Real Estate
QLVE
LVHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLVE vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank
QLVE
LVHD
QLVE vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLVE | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.42 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.97 | 6.00 | +0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLVE vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLVE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVE and LVHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLVE | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.96% | -37.32% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.60% | -6.17% | -5.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.29% | -14.29% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.60% | -16.75% | -6.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.40% | -0.82% | -5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.23% | -4.02% | -4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 2.48% | +0.71% |
Volatility
QLVE vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) at 4.43%. This indicates that QLVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLVE | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 4.43% | +3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.56% | 7.77% | +9.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.90% | 10.30% | +8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 12.99% | +1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 15.55% | +0.54% |
QLVE vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLVE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLVE vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison
QLVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than LVHD's 3.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 3.21% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% |
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.70% | 3.14% | 3.11% | 3.00% | 2.48% | 2.57% | 1.66% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLVE and LVHD have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLVE has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to LVHD (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVE dropped -29.96% vs LVHD's -37.32%.
On 5-year performance, LVHD leads with 7.56% vs 6.79% for QLVE. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 7.56% return vs 6.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QLVE.
LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 2.70% for QLVE.
QLVE is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while LVHD is Dividend. QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index, while LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QLVE and 0.27% for LVHD.
LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLVE and LVHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer