PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLVE vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLVE vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLVE achieves a 19.60% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 13.82% return.


QLVE

1D
0.48%
1M
8.70%
YTD
19.60%
6M
21.24%
1Y
36.46%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*

VWO

1D
1.27%
1M
3.73%
YTD
13.82%
6M
15.26%
1Y
32.89%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
9.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLVE vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
19.60%21.87%10.17%8.53%-13.10%0.90%4.16%4.98%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
13.82%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%6.40%

Correlation

The correlation between QLVE and VWO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.93

The correlation between QLVE and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLVE vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLVE
VWO

Technology

59.6%
29.6%

Financial Services

38.5%
19.5%

Communication Services

18.4%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
10.7%

Healthcare

7.6%
3.9%

Energy

7.2%
4.6%

Industrials

7.1%
8.0%

Basic Materials

5.5%
8.0%

Utilities

5.4%
2.9%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.2%

Technology

QLVE
59.6%
VWO
29.6%

Financial Services

QLVE
38.5%
VWO
19.5%

Communication Services

QLVE
18.4%
VWO
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

QLVE
10.8%
VWO
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

QLVE
10.4%
VWO
10.7%

Healthcare

QLVE
7.6%
VWO
3.9%

Energy

QLVE
7.2%
VWO
4.6%

Industrials

QLVE
7.1%
VWO
8.0%

Basic Materials

QLVE
5.5%
VWO
8.0%

Utilities

QLVE
5.4%
VWO
2.9%

Real Estate

QLVE
0.1%
VWO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLVE vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLVE
QLVE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QLVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLVE vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLVEVWODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

2.09

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

2.88

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.03

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.84

10.94

+1.90

QLVE vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLVE and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLVEVWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.09

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.33

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.27

+0.22

Drawdowns

QLVE vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLVE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVE and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLVEVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.96%

-67.68%

+37.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-11.17%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-17.37%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.94%

-32.64%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-15.82%

+7.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

3.09%

-0.21%

Volatility

QLVE vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 5.41%. This indicates that QLVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLVEVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.61%

5.41%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.75%

13.13%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.40%

15.83%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.47%

17.36%

-3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

19.20%

-3.41%

QLVE vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLVE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLVE vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

QLVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, which matches VWO's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.39%3.14%3.11%3.00%2.48%2.57%1.66%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.37%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, QLVE and VWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QLVE has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to VWO (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVE dropped -29.96% vs VWO's -67.68%.

On 5-year performance, QLVE leads with 7.88% vs 5.66% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QLVE has performed better with a 7.88% return vs 5.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QLVE.

QLVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 2.37% for VWO.

QLVE is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QLVE and 0.08% for VWO.

QLVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLVE and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer