QLD vs. XDSQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ).
QLD and XDSQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. XDSQ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.
Performance
QLD vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QLD vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | -11.23% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 46.78% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | -4.22% | 14.22% | 23.12% | 23.00% | -16.78% | 12.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a -11.23% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's -4.22% return.
QLD
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -8.26%
- YTD
- -11.23%
- 6M
- -9.73%
- 1Y
- 38.72%
- 3Y*
- 36.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.83%
- 10Y*
- 29.71%
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- -4.22%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 14.44%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QLD vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QLD vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
QLD
XDSQ
QLD vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLD | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.81 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 1.27 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.21 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | 5.87 | -0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLD | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.81 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.61 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between QLD and XDSQ is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QLD vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QLD vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and XDSQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLD | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.13% | -26.06% | -57.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | -12.18% | -12.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.15% | -6.46% | -11.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.30% | -5.08% | -13.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 2.50% | +5.25% |
Volatility
QLD vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a higher volatility of 13.16% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 5.68%. This indicates that QLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QLD | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.16% | 5.68% | +7.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.67% | 9.63% | +16.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.97% | 17.99% | +26.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.76% | 15.32% | +29.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.47% | 15.32% | +29.15% |