QLD vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. QLD is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

QLD vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 38.76% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 869.59% return.

QLD

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: 38.76%
• 6M: 36.36%
• 1Y: 82.33%
• 3Y*: 46.92%
• 5Y*: 23.39%
• 10Y*: 37.21%

LINT

• 1D: 10.62%
• 1M: 28.51%
• YTD: 869.59%
• 6M: 899.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLD vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	38.76%	5.38%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	869.59%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and LINT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.55

QLD vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QLD	LINT
Technology	58.7%	100.0%
Communication Services	14.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	-
Healthcare	3.7%	-
Industrials	2.6%	-
Utilities	1.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	-
Energy	0.5%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QLD vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 67
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 65
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 63

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLD vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QLD	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.19	—	—

Drawdowns

QLD vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLD	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.13%	-49.54%	-33.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.83%	0.00%	-2.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.14%	-20.53%	+2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.38%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QLD	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.17%	168.26%	-133.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.24%	168.26%	-123.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.82%	168.26%	-123.44%

QLD vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLD vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, more than LINT's 0.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.09%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.12%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLD and LINT in my portfolio?

QLD and LINT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QLD or LINT?

On fees, QLD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLD or LINT?

QLD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLD or LINT?

QLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.09% for LINT.

What is the main difference between QLD and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QLD and 0.97% for LINT.