PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLD vs. ARMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QLD vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QLD vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
-11.23%33.97%
ARMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF
78.95%-61.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a -11.23% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 78.95% return.


QLD

1D
2.44%
1M
-8.26%
YTD
-11.23%
6M
-9.73%
1Y
38.72%
3Y*
36.50%
5Y*
15.83%
10Y*
29.71%

ARMG

1D
5.05%
1M
45.92%
YTD
78.95%
6M
-13.55%
1Y
34.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QLD vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QLD vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMG
ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLD vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLDARMGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

0.29

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

1.34

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.17

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

0.51

+1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.27

0.92

+4.35

QLD vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the ARMG Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLD and ARMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLDARMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.29

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

-0.22

+0.75

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and ARMG is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QLD vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than ARMG's 2.72% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.19%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%
ARMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF
2.72%4.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QLD vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, roughly equal to the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and ARMG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QLDARMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.13%

-80.28%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.13%

-68.13%

+43.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.15%

-57.60%

+39.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.30%

-56.38%

+38.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.75%

37.78%

-30.03%

Volatility

QLD vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is 13.16%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a volatility of 45.35%. This indicates that QLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QLDARMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.16%

45.35%

-32.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.67%

76.96%

-51.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.97%

117.71%

-72.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.76%

123.23%

-78.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.47%

123.23%

-78.76%