ARMG vs. NBIG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG).

ARMG and NBIG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ARMG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jan 14, 2025. NBIG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Oct 27, 2025.

Performance

ARMG vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ARMG vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	70.35%	-64.25%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	13.51%	-62.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMG achieves a 70.35% return, which is significantly higher than NBIG's 13.51% return.

ARMG

• 1D: 20.77%
• 1M: 32.29%
• YTD: 70.35%
• 6M: -7.53%
• 1Y: 28.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBIG

• 1D: 25.17%
• 1M: 14.22%
• YTD: 13.51%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMG vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ARMG and NBIG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

ARMG

Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF

NBIG

Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF

Return for Risk

ARMG vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMG

ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 28
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 39
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMG vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ARMG	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.38	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.68	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARMG	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.24	-0.44	+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between ARMG and NBIG is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ARMG vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	2.86%	4.86%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ARMG vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMG drawdown since its inception was -80.28%, which is greater than NBIG's maximum drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMG and NBIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARMG	NBIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.28%	-75.83%	-4.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.64%	-61.09%	+1.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.38%	-53.55%	-2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.71%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARMG	NBIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	45.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	76.86%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	117.64%	199.11%	-81.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	123.35%	199.11%	-75.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	123.35%	199.11%	-75.76%