ARMG vs. PLTG
ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) and PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ARMG returned 343.67% vs -50.52% for PLTG. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
ARMG vs. PLTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARMG achieves a 837.72% return, which is significantly higher than PLTG's -63.47% return.
ARMG
- 1D
- -14.47%
- 1M
- 56.79%
- YTD
- 837.72%
- 6M
- 769.43%
- 1Y
- 343.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTG
- 1D
- -14.03%
- 1M
- -27.19%
- YTD
- -63.47%
- 6M
- -69.73%
- 1Y
- -50.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMG vs. PLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 837.72% | -24.89% |
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | -63.47% | 100.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMG and PLTG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMG vs. PLTG — Risk / Return Rank
ARMG
PLTG
ARMG vs. PLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMG | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.97 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.08 | -0.67 | +5.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.87 | -1.18 | +10.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMG vs. PLTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMG drawdown since its inception was -80.28%, which is greater than PLTG's maximum drawdown of -75.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMG and PLTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMG | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.28% | -75.18% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.13% | -75.18% | +7.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.47% | -75.18% | +60.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.83% | -31.87% | -19.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.95% | 42.89% | -3.94% |
Volatility
ARMG vs. PLTG - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a higher volatility of 71.63% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) at 37.95%. This indicates that ARMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMG | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 71.63% | 37.95% | +33.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 114.78% | 79.00% | +35.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.12% | 102.87% | +37.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.88% | 105.90% | +36.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.88% | 105.90% | +36.98% |
ARMG vs. PLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ARMG and PLTG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
ARMG vs. PLTG - Dividend Comparison
ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than PLTG's 49.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 0.52% | 4.86% |
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | 49.65% | 18.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMG and PLTG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARMG has higher volatility (71.63%) compared to PLTG (37.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARMG dropped -80.28% vs PLTG's -75.18%.
On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 343.67% vs -50.52% for PLTG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, PLTG has been the lower-risk option at 37.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 343.67% return vs -50.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARMG and PLTG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 49.65%, compared with 0.52% for ARMG.
ARMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARMG and PLTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer