PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QINT vs. IDEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QINT vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly higher than IDEV's 8.92% return.


QINT

1D
-0.76%
1M
3.10%
YTD
9.42%
6M
12.42%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*

IDEV

1D
-0.90%
1M
3.23%
YTD
8.92%
6M
11.57%
1Y
23.20%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QINT vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
9.42%38.12%6.53%20.36%-19.75%9.29%17.95%23.46%-14.13%
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
8.92%32.56%4.54%17.36%-14.99%13.00%8.32%23.12%-11.12%

Correlation

The correlation between QINT and IDEV is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.96

The correlation between QINT and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

QINT vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QINT
IDEV

Financial Services

19.8%
24.2%

Industrials

19.0%
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
7.7%

Healthcare

10.2%
8.6%

Basic Materials

9.4%
8.0%

Technology

8.9%
9.9%

Energy

6.4%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
6.0%

Communication Services

4.4%
4.0%

Utilities

1.6%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.0%
2.9%

Financial Services

QINT
19.8%
IDEV
24.2%

Industrials

QINT
19.0%
IDEV
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QINT
13.6%
IDEV
7.7%

Healthcare

QINT
10.2%
IDEV
8.6%

Basic Materials

QINT
9.4%
IDEV
8.0%

Technology

QINT
8.9%
IDEV
9.9%

Energy

QINT
6.4%
IDEV
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

QINT
5.8%
IDEV
6.0%

Communication Services

QINT
4.4%
IDEV
4.0%

Utilities

QINT
1.6%
IDEV
3.7%

Real Estate

QINT
1.0%
IDEV
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QINT vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QINT
QINT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QINT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QINT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IDEV
IDEV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QINT vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QINTIDEVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

1.61

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

2.29

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

2.08

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.14

8.16

+0.98

QINT vs. IDEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the IDEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QINT and IDEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QINTIDEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.61

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.52

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.55

+0.02

Drawdowns

QINT vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, roughly equal to the maximum IDEV drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and IDEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QINTIDEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.86%

-34.77%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-11.20%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.56%

-13.41%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.86%

-29.15%

-4.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-0.98%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-6.57%

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.85%

-0.03%

Volatility

QINT vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison

American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) at 4.60%. This indicates that QINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QINTIDEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

4.60%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

12.10%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.84%

14.51%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

16.26%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

17.27%

+0.79%

QINT vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

QINT vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison

QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than IDEV's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
3.13%3.40%3.30%3.07%2.69%3.05%2.00%3.18%3.16%1.54%
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
2.50%2.66%3.49%3.12%3.56%2.30%1.61%1.83%0.42%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, QINT and IDEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QINT has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to IDEV (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs IDEV's -34.77%.

On 5-year performance, QINT leads with 8.81% vs 8.48% for IDEV. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QINT has performed better with a 8.81% return vs 8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.

IDEV has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.50% for QINT.

QINT tracks Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.05% for IDEV.

QINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QINT and IDEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer