QINT vs. FDG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) and FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while FDG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by American Century. QINT is passively managed, while FDG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QINT returned 8.81%/yr vs 12.61%/yr for FDG. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QINT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDG.

Performance

QINT vs. FDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly higher than FDG's 7.52% return.

QINT

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 9.42%
• 6M: 12.42%
• 1Y: 25.73%
• 3Y*: 20.67%
• 5Y*: 8.81%
• 10Y*: —

FDG

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 7.52%
• 6M: 9.17%
• 1Y: 31.12%
• 3Y*: 29.27%
• 5Y*: 12.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QINT vs. FDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF	9.42%	38.12%	6.53%	20.36%	-19.75%	9.29%	52.95%
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	7.52%	22.13%	45.89%	37.22%	-35.74%	8.52%	93.61%

Correlation

The correlation between QINT and FDG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020	0.64

The correlation between QINT and FDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

QINT vs. FDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QINT	FDG
Financial Services	19.8%	4.7%
Industrials	19.0%	5.2%
Consumer Cyclical	13.6%	17.1%
Healthcare	10.2%	13.2%
Basic Materials	9.4%	-
Technology	8.9%	37.7%
Energy	6.4%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	-
Communication Services	4.4%	21.5%
Utilities	1.6%	0.1%
Real Estate	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

QINT vs. FDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QINT

QINT Risk / Return Rank: 50
QINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
QINT Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
QINT Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FDG

FDG Risk / Return Rank: 46
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QINT vs. FDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QINT	FDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.76	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.37	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.30	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.26	1.99	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.14	7.02	+2.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QINT vs. FDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the FDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QINT and FDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QINT	FDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	1.76	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.51	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.92	-0.35

Drawdowns

QINT vs. FDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, smaller than the maximum FDG drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and FDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QINT	FDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.86%	-43.69%	+9.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.41%	-15.71%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.56%	-26.14%	+12.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.86%	-43.69%	+9.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.95%	-3.13%	+2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.55%	-13.43%	+5.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	4.45%	-1.63%

Volatility

QINT vs. FDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is 4.84%, while American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that QINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QINT	FDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	5.18%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.35%	14.03%	-1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.84%	17.77%	-2.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.22%	24.67%	-8.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.06%	24.90%	-6.84%

QINT vs. FDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FDG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

QINT vs. FDG - Dividend Comparison

QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, while FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF	2.50%	2.66%	3.49%	3.12%	3.56%	2.30%	1.61%	1.83%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QINT and FDG in my portfolio?

QINT and FDG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QINT or FDG?

FDG has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to QINT (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs FDG's -43.69%.

Which ETF is better, QINT or FDG?

On 5-year performance, FDG leads with 12.61% vs 8.81% for QINT. On fees, QINT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, QINT has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QINT or FDG?

Over the 5-year period, FDG has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 8.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QINT or FDG?

QINT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QINT or FDG?

QINT has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.

What is the main difference between QINT and FDG?

QINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FDG is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.45% for FDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.