FDG vs. AVEM
FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) and AVEM (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while AVEM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. FDG is actively managed, while AVEM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDG returned 13.50%/yr vs 10.44%/yr for AVEM. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AVEM.
Performance
FDG vs. AVEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDG achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly lower than AVEM's 29.38% return.
FDG
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 12.54%
- 1Y
- 34.58%
- 3Y*
- 30.14%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- —
AVEM
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 10.00%
- YTD
- 29.38%
- 6M
- 31.57%
- 1Y
- 57.57%
- 3Y*
- 26.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- —
FDG vs. AVEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 9.71% | 22.13% | 45.89% | 37.22% | -35.74% | 8.52% | 93.61% |
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 29.38% | 34.48% | 7.49% | 15.30% | -18.15% | 5.16% | 60.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDG and AVEM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FDG and AVEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDG vs. AVEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDG
AVEM
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
FDG
AVEM
Communication Services
FDG
AVEM
Consumer Cyclical
FDG
AVEM
Healthcare
FDG
AVEM
Industrials
FDG
AVEM
Financial Services
FDG
AVEM
Energy
FDG
AVEM
Utilities
FDG
AVEM
Basic Materials
FDG
-
AVEM
Consumer Defensive
FDG
-
AVEM
Real Estate
FDG
-
AVEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDG vs. AVEM — Risk / Return Rank
FDG
AVEM
FDG vs. AVEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDG | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 2.98 | -1.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.62 | 3.80 | -1.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.54 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 4.50 | -2.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.14 | 17.88 | -9.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDG | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.98 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.57 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.67 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
FDG vs. AVEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDG drawdown since its inception was -43.69%, which is greater than AVEM's maximum drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDG and AVEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDG | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.69% | -36.05% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.71% | -13.13% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.14% | -18.02% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.69% | -34.00% | -9.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | 0.00% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.44% | -10.10% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 3.30% | +1.14% |
Volatility
FDG vs. AVEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) is 4.66%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a volatility of 8.14%. This indicates that FDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDG | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.66% | 8.14% | -3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 16.64% | -2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.68% | 19.40% | -1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 18.33% | +6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.89% | 20.55% | +4.34% |
FDG vs. AVEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEM's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDG vs. AVEM - Dividend Comparison
FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.95% | 2.45% | 3.17% | 3.06% | 2.77% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 0.35% |
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDG and AVEM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVEM has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to FDG (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDG dropped -43.69% vs AVEM's -36.05%.
On 5-year performance, FDG leads with 13.50% vs 10.44% for AVEM. On fees, AVEM is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, FDG has been the lower-risk option at 4.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDG has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 10.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVEM is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDG.
AVEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.
FDG is categorized as Global Equities, while AVEM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDG and 0.33% for AVEM.
AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDG and AVEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer