PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDG vs. AVEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDG vs. AVEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDG achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than AVEM's 16.96% return.


FDG

1D
3.17%
1M
-3.88%
6M
0.24%
YTD
0.10%
1Y
14.28%
3Y*
22.99%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.05%

AVEM

1D
0.10%
1M
-3.17%
6M
8.33%
YTD
16.96%
1Y
33.47%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$186.43M$193.15M$184.15M
$1.83M$1.61M$2.38M

FDG vs. AVEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FDG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
0.10%22.13%45.89%37.22%-35.74%8.52%96.27%
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
16.96%34.48%7.49%15.30%-18.15%5.16%65.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FDG and AVEM is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2020

0.63

The correlation between FDG and AVEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDG vs. AVEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDG
AVEM

Technology

39.9%
41.9%

Communication Services

24.5%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

16.8%
7.3%

Healthcare

9.2%
2.6%

Industrials

5.5%
7.9%

Financial Services

3.5%
18.9%

Energy

0.6%
3.9%

Utilities

0.1%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
2.7%

Basic Materials

-

6.4%

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Technology

FDG
39.9%
AVEM
41.9%

Communication Services

FDG
24.5%
AVEM
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FDG
16.8%
AVEM
7.3%

Healthcare

FDG
9.2%
AVEM
2.6%

Industrials

FDG
5.5%
AVEM
7.9%

Financial Services

FDG
3.5%
AVEM
18.9%

Energy

FDG
0.6%
AVEM
3.9%

Utilities

FDG
0.1%
AVEM
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

FDG
0.0%
AVEM
2.7%

Basic Materials

FDG

-

AVEM
6.4%

Real Estate

FDG

-

AVEM
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDG vs. AVEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDG
FDG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

AVEM
AVEM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AVEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDG vs. AVEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDGAVEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.26

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

2.27

-1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.06

7.27

-5.21

FDG vs. AVEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the AVEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDG and AVEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDG vs. AVEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDG drawdown since its inception was -43.69%, which is greater than AVEM's maximum drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDG and AVEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGAVEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.69%

-36.05%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.71%

-14.28%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.14%

-18.02%

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.69%

-31.81%

-11.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.82%

-10.65%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.27%

-10.02%

-3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.45%

4.45%

+1.00%

Volatility

FDG vs. AVEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) is 7.67%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that FDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGAVEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.67%

8.84%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.13%

21.85%

-4.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.59%

23.91%

-3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.09%

19.33%

+5.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.99%

21.07%

+3.92%

FDG vs. AVEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEM's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDG vs. AVEM - Dividend Comparison

FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.96%2.45%3.17%3.06%2.77%2.61%1.60%0.35%
FDG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDG and AVEM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVEM has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to FDG (7.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDG dropped -43.69% vs AVEM's -36.05%.

On 5-year performance, AVEM leads with 9.32% vs 8.96% for FDG. On fees, AVEM is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, FDG has been the lower-risk option at 7.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVEM has performed better with a 9.32% return vs 8.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVEM is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDG.

AVEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.

FDG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVEM is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDG and 0.33% for AVEM.

AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDG and AVEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer