PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QINT vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QINT vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 8.57% return.


QINT

1D
-1.04%
1M
1.23%
6M
6.16%
YTD
11.64%
1Y
26.49%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.32%

DGRW

1D
0.49%
1M
0.69%
6M
6.01%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
13.71%
ALL TIME*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.03M$48.50M$56.54M
$2.00M$2.83M$3.27M

QINT vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
11.64%38.12%6.53%20.36%-19.75%9.29%17.95%23.46%-14.13%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
8.57%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-12.07%

Correlation

The correlation between QINT and DGRW is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018

0.75

The correlation between QINT and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

QINT vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QINT
DGRW

Financial Services

20.6%
8.4%

Industrials

18.6%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

15.2%
8.0%

Healthcare

10.4%
12.8%

Technology

9.9%
33.8%

Basic Materials

8.3%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
6.7%

Energy

5.3%
4.5%

Communication Services

3.9%
11.1%

Utilities

1.5%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Financial Services

QINT
20.6%
DGRW
8.4%

Industrials

QINT
18.6%
DGRW
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QINT
15.2%
DGRW
8.0%

Healthcare

QINT
10.4%
DGRW
12.8%

Technology

QINT
9.9%
DGRW
33.8%

Basic Materials

QINT
8.3%
DGRW
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

QINT
5.5%
DGRW
6.7%

Energy

QINT
5.3%
DGRW
4.5%

Communication Services

QINT
3.9%
DGRW
11.1%

Utilities

QINT
1.5%
DGRW
0.2%

Real Estate

QINT
0.8%
DGRW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QINT vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QINT
QINT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QINT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QINT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QINT vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QINTDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

1.79

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.36

7.25

+2.11

QINT vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QINT and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QINT vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QINTDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.86%

-32.04%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-8.30%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.56%

-16.21%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.86%

-17.27%

-16.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-1.31%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-3.00%

-4.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.05%

+0.77%

Volatility

QINT vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.92%. This indicates that QINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QINTDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

2.92%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.56%

8.33%

+5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

10.44%

+5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

14.01%

+2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

16.18%

+1.86%

QINT vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

QINT vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than DGRW's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.28%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
2.43%2.66%3.49%3.12%3.56%2.30%1.61%1.83%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QINT and DGRW have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QINT has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to DGRW (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 5-year performance, DGRW leads with 11.41% vs 9.64% for QINT. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 11.41% return vs 9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.

QINT has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 1.28% for DGRW.

QINT tracks Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.28% for DGRW.

QINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QINT and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer