QINT vs. BKIE
QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - QINT tracks the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index while BKIE tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QINT returned 8.81%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for BKIE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QINT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.
Performance
QINT vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 8.46% return.
QINT
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 9.42%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 25.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.81%
- 10Y*
- —
BKIE
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 22.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
QINT vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 9.42% | 38.12% | 6.53% | 20.36% | -19.75% | 9.29% | 41.39% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 8.46% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 13.75% | 34.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between QINT and BKIE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.96 |
The correlation between QINT and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
QINT vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QINT
BKIE
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
QINT
BKIE
Industrials
QINT
BKIE
Consumer Cyclical
QINT
BKIE
Healthcare
QINT
BKIE
Basic Materials
QINT
BKIE
Technology
QINT
BKIE
Energy
QINT
BKIE
Consumer Defensive
QINT
BKIE
Communication Services
QINT
BKIE
Utilities
QINT
BKIE
Real Estate
QINT
BKIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QINT vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank
QINT
BKIE
QINT vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QINT | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 1.56 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 2.23 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.28 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 1.99 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 7.68 | +1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QINT | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.56 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.56 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.92 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
QINT vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and BKIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QINT | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.86% | -28.19% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.41% | -11.41% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.56% | -13.19% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.86% | -28.19% | -5.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -1.33% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -4.98% | -2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.95% | -0.13% |
Volatility
QINT vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) at 4.42%. This indicates that QINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QINT | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 4.42% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 12.17% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 14.58% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 16.12% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 16.34% | +1.72% |
QINT vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
QINT vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison
QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than BKIE's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 2.50% | 2.66% | 3.49% | 3.12% | 3.56% | 2.30% | 1.61% | 1.83% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, QINT and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QINT has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to BKIE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs BKIE's -28.19%.
On 5-year performance, BKIE leads with 9.05% vs 8.81% for QINT. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 9.05% return vs 8.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.
BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.50% for QINT.
QINT tracks Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.04% for BKIE.
QINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QINT and BKIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer