PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QIBGX vs. FIHBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QIBGX vs. FIHBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIBGX achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly higher than FIHBX's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, QIBGX has outperformed FIHBX with an annualized return of 10.95%, while FIHBX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.68% annualized return.


QIBGX

1D
1.02%
1M
0.17%
6M
5.01%
YTD
5.62%
1Y
11.73%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
10.95%
ALL TIME*
8.55%

FIHBX

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.67%
6M
0.64%
YTD
0.85%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*
4.68%
ALL TIME*
7.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

QIBGX vs. FIHBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QIBGX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund
5.62%14.68%28.30%14.26%-13.54%17.43%16.17%19.00%-2.96%14.12%
FIHBX
Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund
0.85%8.59%6.40%13.17%-12.64%3.92%5.99%15.01%-2.80%7.19%

Correlation

The correlation between QIBGX and FIHBX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2003

0.38

Over the past year, QIBGX and FIHBX have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QIBGX vs. FIHBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QIBGX
QIBGX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
QIBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
QIBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FIHBX
FIHBX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FIHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FIHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QIBGX vs. FIHBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QIBGXFIHBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

1.85

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.59

9.24

-6.65

QIBGX vs. FIHBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIBGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the FIHBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIBGX and FIHBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QIBGX vs. FIHBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIBGX drawdown since its inception was -42.95%, which is greater than FIHBX's maximum drawdown of -31.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIBGX and FIHBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QIBGXFIHBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.95%

-31.05%

-11.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-2.45%

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.25%

-3.60%

-14.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.32%

-16.35%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.97%

-21.67%

-4.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-0.79%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-2.28%

-3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

0.49%

+3.82%

Volatility

QIBGX vs. FIHBX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) at 0.64%. This indicates that QIBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIHBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QIBGXFIHBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

0.64%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

2.70%

+4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

3.42%

+10.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

5.19%

+10.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

5.71%

+8.50%

QIBGX vs. FIHBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIBGX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FIHBX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QIBGX vs. FIHBX - Dividend Comparison

QIBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, more than FIHBX's 6.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIHBX
Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund
6.04%6.29%5.94%5.93%4.58%4.25%5.14%5.79%6.24%5.55%5.75%6.46%
QIBGX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund
8.39%8.86%20.13%1.82%6.92%9.99%4.36%4.33%10.60%1.59%1.86%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


QIBGX and FIHBX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QIBGX has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to FIHBX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIBGX dropped -42.95% vs FIHBX's -31.05%.

FIHBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QIBGX and FIHBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer