PortfoliosLab logo
FIHBX vs. FFRHX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FIHBX and FFRHX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

FIHBX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%250.00%300.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
324.22%
168.87%
FIHBX
FFRHX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FIHBX:

2.38

FFRHX:

1.70

Sortino Ratio

FIHBX:

3.55

FFRHX:

2.78

Omega Ratio

FIHBX:

1.54

FFRHX:

1.67

Calmar Ratio

FIHBX:

2.72

FFRHX:

1.66

Martin Ratio

FIHBX:

11.50

FFRHX:

8.36

Ulcer Index

FIHBX:

0.74%

FFRHX:

0.65%

Daily Std Dev

FIHBX:

3.57%

FFRHX:

3.20%

Max Drawdown

FIHBX:

-31.43%

FFRHX:

-22.19%

Current Drawdown

FIHBX:

-0.65%

FFRHX:

-1.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIHBX achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's -0.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FIHBX having a 4.53% annualized return and FFRHX not far behind at 4.45%.


FIHBX

YTD

1.20%

1M

0.71%

6M

2.03%

1Y

8.49%

5Y*

5.77%

10Y*

4.53%

FFRHX

YTD

-0.83%

1M

-0.69%

6M

1.26%

1Y

5.46%

5Y*

7.67%

10Y*

4.45%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FIHBX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIHBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FFRHX: current value is 0.67%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FFRHX: 0.67%
Expense ratio chart for FIHBX: current value is 0.50%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FIHBX: 0.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FIHBX vs. FFRHX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIHBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FIHBX is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FIHBX is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FIHBX is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FIHBX is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FIHBX is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FIHBX is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FFRHX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFRHX is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FIHBX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FIHBX, currently valued at 2.38, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
FIHBX: 2.38
FFRHX: 1.70
The chart of Sortino ratio for FIHBX, currently valued at 3.55, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FIHBX: 3.55
FFRHX: 2.78
The chart of Omega ratio for FIHBX, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
FIHBX: 1.54
FFRHX: 1.67
The chart of Calmar ratio for FIHBX, currently valued at 2.72, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
FIHBX: 2.72
FFRHX: 1.66
The chart of Martin ratio for FIHBX, currently valued at 11.50, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.00
FIHBX: 11.50
FFRHX: 8.36

The current FIHBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIHBX and FFRHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.504.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.38
1.70
FIHBX
FFRHX

Dividends

FIHBX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

FIHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, less than FFRHX's 8.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FIHBX
Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund
5.97%5.94%5.92%6.04%5.10%5.14%5.80%6.24%5.56%5.76%6.45%6.32%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
8.21%8.33%8.25%5.06%3.27%3.85%5.17%4.75%4.01%3.94%4.25%4.00%

Drawdowns

FIHBX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIHBX drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, which is greater than FFRHX's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIHBX and FFRHX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-3.50%-3.00%-2.50%-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.65%
-1.55%
FIHBX
FFRHX

Volatility

FIHBX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) have volatilities of 2.06% and 2.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.06%
2.11%
FIHBX
FFRHX