FIHBX vs. MNHYX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FIHBX (Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund) and MNHYX (Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FIHBX returned 5.05%/yr vs 6.65%/yr for MNHYX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIHBX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for MNHYX.

Performance

FIHBX vs. MNHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIHBX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than MNHYX's 2.68% return. Over the past 10 years, FIHBX has underperformed MNHYX with an annualized return of 5.05%, while MNHYX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.65% annualized return.

FIHBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 6.62%
• 3Y*: 8.32%
• 5Y*: 3.49%
• 10Y*: 5.05%

MNHYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 6M: 3.68%
• 1Y: 8.67%
• 3Y*: 9.41%
• 5Y*: 5.62%
• 10Y*: 6.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIHBX vs. MNHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIHBX Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund	1.27%	8.59%	6.40%	13.17%	-12.64%	3.92%	5.99%	15.01%	-2.80%	7.19%
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series	2.68%	6.65%	9.63%	13.19%	-7.59%	9.99%	6.26%	13.99%	-1.30%	8.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FIHBX and MNHYX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2009	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between FIHBX and MNHYX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FIHBX vs. MNHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIHBX

FIHBX Risk / Return Rank: 67
FIHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
FIHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FIHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FIHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FIHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

MNHYX

MNHYX Risk / Return Rank: 88
MNHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
MNHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MNHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MNHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
MNHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIHBX vs. MNHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIHBX	MNHYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	3.14	-1.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	4.77	-1.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.74	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	3.45	-0.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.61	15.53	+0.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIHBX vs. MNHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIHBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the MNHYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIHBX and MNHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIHBX	MNHYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	3.14	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	1.53	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	1.61	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	1.84	-0.48

Drawdowns

FIHBX vs. MNHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIHBX drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, which is greater than MNHYX's maximum drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIHBX and MNHYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIHBX	MNHYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.05%	-19.70%	-11.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.45%	-2.51%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.60%	-4.43%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.35%	-10.84%	-5.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.67%	-19.70%	-1.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-1.56%	-0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.46%	0.56%	-0.10%

Volatility

FIHBX vs. MNHYX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) at 0.77%. This indicates that FIHBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIHBX	MNHYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	0.77%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.90%	2.12%	+0.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.40%	2.74%	+0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.19%	3.70%	+1.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.76%	4.15%	+1.61%

FIHBX vs. MNHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIHBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MNHYX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIHBX vs. MNHYX - Dividend Comparison

FIHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, less than MNHYX's 6.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIHBX Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund	6.44%	6.29%	5.94%	5.93%	4.58%	4.25%	5.14%	5.79%	6.24%	5.55%	5.75%	6.46%
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series	6.65%	6.95%	6.38%	6.66%	5.93%	7.93%	4.98%	6.63%	5.26%	5.16%	6.49%	5.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIHBX and MNHYX in my portfolio?

FIHBX and MNHYX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIHBX or MNHYX?

FIHBX has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to MNHYX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIHBX dropped -31.05% vs MNHYX's -19.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MNHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.