QFRD vs. HYP

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

QFRD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF) and HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QFRD is passively managed, while HYP is actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QFRD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HYP.

Performance

QFRD vs. HYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QFRD

• 1D: -3.92%
• 1M: 6.13%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYP

• 1D: -9.65%
• 1M: -5.16%
• YTD: 20.07%
• 6M: 17.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QFRD vs. HYP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF	11.08%
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	6.52%

Correlation

The correlation between QFRD and HYP is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026	0.50

Return for Risk

QFRD vs. HYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QFRD	HYP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.50	0.49	+1.01

Drawdowns

QFRD vs. HYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFRD drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum HYP drawdown of -19.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFRD and HYP.

Drawdown Indicators

	QFRD	HYP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.69%	-19.58%	+9.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.58%	-10.65%	+5.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.86%	-6.45%	+3.59%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QFRD	HYP	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.55%	42.45%	-21.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.55%	42.45%	-21.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.55%	42.45%	-21.90%

QFRD vs. HYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFRD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HYP's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

QFRD vs. HYP - Dividend Comparison

QFRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, which matches HYP's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	0.11%	0.14%
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF	0.11%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QFRD and HYP in my portfolio?

QFRD and HYP have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QFRD or HYP?

On fees, QFRD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QFRD or HYP?

QFRD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QFRD or HYP?

QFRD and HYP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.11%.

What is the main difference between QFRD and HYP?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Golden Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFRD and 0.85% for HYP.