PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QFRD vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QFRD vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QFRD

1D
-0.53%
1M
3.98%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
0.34%
1M
2.59%
6M
9.56%
YTD
11.88%
1Y
22.72%
3Y*
20.65%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
14.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QFRD vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QFRD and ITOT is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QFRD vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QFRD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QFRD vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QFRDITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.92

QFRD vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QFRD vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFRD drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFRD and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QFRDITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-55.20%

+45.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-0.17%

-2.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.34%

-6.95%

+3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

Volatility

QFRD vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QFRDITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.74%

12.83%

+6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.74%

17.46%

+2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.74%

18.24%

+1.50%

QFRD vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFRD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

QFRD vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

QFRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than ITOT's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.99%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
QFRD
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF
0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QFRD and ITOT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QFRD.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.11% for QFRD.

QFRD is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. QFRD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFRD and 0.03% for ITOT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QFRD and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer