QFRD vs. ITOT
QFRD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFRD is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders Index, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QFRD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
QFRD vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFRD
- 1D
- -3.92%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- 14.67%
QFRD vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF | 11.08% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 6.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFRD and ITOT is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFRD vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
QFRD
ITOT
QFRD vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QFRD | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.50 | 0.57 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
QFRD vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFRD drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFRD and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFRD | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.69% | -55.20% | +45.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.58% | -2.95% | -2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -6.97% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.94% | — |
Volatility
QFRD vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFRD | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.55% | 12.51% | +8.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 17.39% | +3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 18.28% | +2.27% |
QFRD vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFRD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFRD vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
QFRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than ITOT's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFRD and ITOT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QFRD.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.11% for QFRD.
QFRD is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. QFRD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFRD and 0.03% for ITOT.
Find the right allocation for QFRD and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer