DVYA vs. BBCA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA).
DVYA and BBCA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DVYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2012. BBCA is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index. It was launched on Aug 7, 2018. Both DVYA and BBCA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DVYA vs. BBCA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DVYA vs. BBCA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | 9.80% | 30.22% | 6.05% | 13.75% | -2.17% | 3.41% | -9.61% | 14.70% | -8.59% |
BBCA JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF | 1.43% | 34.40% | 12.79% | 14.92% | -12.53% | 28.16% | 6.20% | 28.93% | -15.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVYA achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than BBCA's 1.43% return.
DVYA
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- 9.80%
- 6M
- 16.60%
- 1Y
- 42.30%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
BBCA
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 8.86%
- 1Y
- 34.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- 12.04%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DVYA vs. BBCA - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVYA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BBCA's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DVYA vs. BBCA — Risk / Return Rank
DVYA
BBCA
DVYA vs. BBCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DVYA | BBCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.60 | 2.13 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.22 | 2.81 | +0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.41 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 3.33 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.73 | 15.60 | +0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVYA | BBCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.13 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.73 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.57 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between DVYA and BBCA is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DVYA vs. BBCA - Dividend Comparison
DVYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than BBCA's 1.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | 4.47% | 4.71% | 5.97% | 6.48% | 7.29% | 5.81% | 3.66% | 5.52% | 6.24% | 4.74% | 4.79% | 5.33% |
BBCA JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF | 1.86% | 1.83% | 2.36% | 2.51% | 2.65% | 2.17% | 2.41% | 2.32% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DVYA vs. BBCA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVYA drawdown since its inception was -45.61%, which is greater than BBCA's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVYA and BBCA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVYA | BBCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.61% | -42.81% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.34% | -10.42% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.59% | -24.43% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.15% | -5.68% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.16% | -5.97% | -4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 2.23% | +0.42% |
Volatility
DVYA vs. BBCA - Volatility Comparison
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) at 5.79%. This indicates that DVYA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DVYA | BBCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 5.79% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 11.06% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.38% | 16.08% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 16.67% | -1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 20.27% | -2.69% |