DVYA vs. CN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN).

DVYA and CN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DVYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2012. CN is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Apr 30, 2014. Both DVYA and CN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

DVYA vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DVYA vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF	9.80%	30.22%	6.05%	13.75%	-2.17%	3.41%	-9.61%	14.70%	-14.87%	16.99%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-3.10%	-11.87%	-23.85%	-12.74%	31.55%	26.79%	-22.41%	43.69%

Returns By Period

DVYA

• 1D: 2.21%
• 1M: -6.15%
• YTD: 9.80%
• 6M: 16.60%
• 1Y: 42.30%
• 3Y*: 19.30%
• 5Y*: 9.83%
• 10Y*: 7.47%

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVYA vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVYA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.

CN

Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF

DVYA

iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF

Return for Risk

DVYA vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVYA

DVYA Risk / Return Rank: 95
DVYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
DVYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
DVYA Omega Ratio Rank: 96
DVYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DVYA Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVYA vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DVYA	CN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.73	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DVYA	CN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between DVYA and CN is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

DVYA vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

DVYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF	4.47%	4.71%	5.97%	6.48%	7.29%	5.81%	3.66%	5.52%	6.24%	4.74%	4.79%	5.33%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DVYA	CN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.15%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.16%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DVYA	CN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.38%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.02%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.58%	—	—