PortfoliosLab logo
DVYA vs. CN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DVYA and CN is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

DVYA vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


DVYA

YTD

6.57%

1M

12.64%

6M

4.37%

1Y

6.39%

5Y*

10.68%

10Y*

2.53%

CN

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DVYA vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVYA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DVYA vs. CN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVYA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DVYA is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DVYA is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DVYA is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DVYA is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DVYA is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DVYA is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

CN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CN is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CN is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CN is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CN is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CN is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CN is 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DVYA vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

DVYA vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

DVYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
5.62%5.97%6.48%7.30%5.81%3.66%5.52%6.24%4.74%4.80%5.33%5.28%
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%100.13%4.04%0.21%2.00%0.78%4.18%2.09%0.81%9.12%4.03%1.15%

Drawdowns

DVYA vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

DVYA vs. CN - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...