DVYA vs. CN
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN).
DVYA and CN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DVYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2012. CN is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Apr 30, 2014. Both DVYA and CN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DVYA or CN.
Key characteristics
| DVYA | CN | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.95% | -64.29% |
| 1Y Return | 17.80% | -31.82% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.87% | -10.75% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.45% | 32.33% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.10% | 12.39% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.26 | -0.18 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.98% | 148.76% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.62% | -99.11% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.03% | -91.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVYA and CN is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
DVYA vs. CN - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DVYA achieves a 3.95% return, which is significantly higher than CN's -64.29% return. Over the past 10 years, DVYA has underperformed CN with an annualized return of 1.10%, while CN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.39% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DVYA vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVYA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DVYA vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DVYA vs. CN - Dividend Comparison
DVYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, less than CN's 16,459.04% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | 6.10% | 6.48% | 7.29% | 5.81% | 3.66% | 5.52% | 6.24% | 4.74% | 4.79% | 5.33% | 5.28% | 5.63% |
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 16,459.04% | 235.17% | 61.66% | 530.55% | 159.04% | 3,205.11% | 989.83% | 318.27% | 2,808.84% | 4,168.13% | 888.58% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DVYA vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVYA drawdown since its inception was -45.62%, smaller than the maximum CN drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVYA and CN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DVYA vs. CN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) is 4.59%, while Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) has a volatility of 33.78%. This indicates that DVYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.