QFHD vs. DEW
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and DEW (WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while DEW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Global High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for DEW.
Performance
QFHD vs. DEW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DEW
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 13.36%
- 6M
- 12.75%
- 1Y
- 26.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
QFHD vs. DEW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 7.93% |
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund | 11.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and DEW is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. DEW — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DEW
QFHD vs. DEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFHD | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. DEW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum DEW drawdown of -65.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and DEW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -65.55% | +60.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -0.77% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -12.40% | +10.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.62% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. DEW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.45% | 9.75% | +0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.45% | 12.98% | -2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.45% | 15.41% | -4.96% |
QFHD vs. DEW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DEW's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. DEW - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than DEW's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund | 3.28% | 3.71% | 4.02% | 4.55% | 3.82% | 3.55% | 4.10% | 3.74% | 4.17% | 3.18% | 3.42% | 4.32% |
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and DEW have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QFHD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QFHD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DEW.
DEW has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 1.33% for QFHD.
QFHD is categorized as Dividend, while DEW is Large Cap Value Equities. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while DEW tracks WisdomTree Global High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.58% for DEW.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and DEW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer