QFHD vs. AMDY
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while AMDY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. QFHD is passively managed, while AMDY is actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDY.
Performance
QFHD vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDY
- 1D
- -10.42%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- 83.37%
- 6M
- 83.46%
- 1Y
- 199.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QFHD vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 7.01% |
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 80.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and AMDY is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
AMDY
QFHD vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QFHD | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.82 | 1.07 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and AMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -53.92% | +48.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -12.88% | +11.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -17.99% | +15.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.25% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 41.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 54.60% | -44.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 46.43% | -36.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 46.43% | -36.06% |
QFHD vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than AMDY's 66.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 66.60% | 80.68% | 109.98% | 6.68% |
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and AMDY have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QFHD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QFHD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDY.
AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 66.60%, compared with 1.34% for QFHD.
QFHD is categorized as Dividend, while AMDY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.99% for AMDY.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and AMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer