QEMM vs. EEMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QEMM (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF) and EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QEMM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while EEMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QEMM returned 8.96%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for EEMO. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QEMM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EEMO.

Performance

QEMM vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEMM achieves a 24.39% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 40.25% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QEMM having a 8.96% annualized return and EEMO not far behind at 8.88%.

QEMM

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: 6.69%
• YTD: 24.39%
• 6M: 26.00%
• 1Y: 42.27%
• 3Y*: 19.52%
• 5Y*: 7.37%
• 10Y*: 8.96%

EEMO

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: 18.59%
• YTD: 40.25%
• 6M: 41.33%
• 1Y: 57.41%
• 3Y*: 25.30%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: 8.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEMM vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	24.39%	21.92%	4.98%	12.50%	-17.82%	6.34%	9.95%	15.40%	-13.33%	31.50%
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	40.25%	10.99%	9.88%	13.90%	-18.73%	-5.57%	9.66%	21.17%	-17.24%	49.65%

Correlation

The correlation between QEMM and EEMO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014	0.67

The correlation between QEMM and EEMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QEMM vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QEMM	EEMO
Technology	33.8%	43.8%
Financial Services	19.6%	18.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	3.2%
Industrials	7.2%	11.5%
Communication Services	6.4%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	1.2%
Energy	5.7%	2.5%
Basic Materials	5.6%	12.9%
Healthcare	3.5%	3.0%
Utilities	3.0%	2.0%
Real Estate	0.8%	0.5%

Return for Risk

QEMM vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEMM

QEMM Risk / Return Rank: 78
QEMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
QEMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QEMM Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QEMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QEMM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

EEMO

EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 75
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEMM vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QEMM	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.36	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	3.28	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.46	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	3.91	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.92	15.67	-0.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QEMM vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QEMM Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEMM and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QEMM	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	2.36	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.37	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.41	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.13	+0.21

Drawdowns

QEMM vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEMM drawdown since its inception was -36.89%, smaller than the maximum EEMO drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEMM and EEMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QEMM	EEMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.89%	-48.47%	+11.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	-14.75%	+4.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.03%	-26.06%	+9.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.49%	-34.03%	+6.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.89%	-46.57%	+9.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	-1.32%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.64%	-20.17%	+9.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	3.67%	-0.83%

Volatility

QEMM vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) is 7.29%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that QEMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QEMM	EEMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.29%	14.32%	-7.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.78%	22.10%	-7.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.69%	24.45%	-7.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.23%	19.33%	-4.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.89%	21.59%	-4.70%

QEMM vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEMM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

QEMM vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

QEMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than EEMO's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	1.64%	2.31%	2.57%	3.65%	3.82%	1.51%	1.53%	2.13%	13.10%	5.13%	1.55%	2.92%
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	4.34%	4.90%	5.17%	4.88%	4.07%	2.35%	2.48%	3.05%	2.86%	2.11%	2.03%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QEMM and EEMO in my portfolio?

QEMM and EEMO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QEMM or EEMO?

EEMO has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to QEMM (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QEMM dropped -36.89% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

Which ETF is better, QEMM or EEMO?

On 10-year performance, QEMM leads with 8.96% vs 8.88% for EEMO. On fees, QEMM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QEMM has been the lower-risk option at 7.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QEMM or EEMO?

Over the 10-year period, QEMM has performed better with a 8.96% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QEMM or EEMO?

QEMM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EEMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QEMM or EEMO?

QEMM has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 1.64% for EEMO.

What is the main difference between QEMM and EEMO?

QEMM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EEMO is Momentum. QEMM tracks MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QEMM and 0.31% for EEMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QEMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.