PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDTE vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDTE vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 2.12% return.


QDTE

1D
-3.23%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
12.61%
6M
11.52%
1Y
33.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.04%
1M
0.21%
YTD
2.12%
6M
1.99%
1Y
6.93%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTE vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QDTE and BUCK is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDTE vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTE vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDTEBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.50

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

5.32

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.82

28.71

-15.89

QDTE vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTE and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDTE vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDTEBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.86%

-5.43%

-17.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-1.31%

-8.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-0.04%

-3.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-0.49%

-2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

0.24%

+2.39%

Volatility

QDTE vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a higher volatility of 8.57% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.28%. This indicates that QDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDTEBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.57%

0.28%

+8.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.32%

1.37%

+11.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

2.98%

+13.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.99%

3.46%

+15.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.99%

3.46%

+15.53%

QDTE vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDTE vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.23%, more than BUCK's 7.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.40%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
44.23%49.49%32.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDTE and BUCK have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDTE has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to BUCK (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTE dropped -22.86% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 33.64% vs 6.93% for BUCK. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 33.64% return vs 6.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.23%, compared with 7.40% for BUCK.

QDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for QDTE and 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDTE and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer