PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDPL vs. THLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QDPL vs. THLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QDPL vs. THLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
-3.59%16.52%22.83%23.66%-1.85%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
6.72%10.50%9.52%5.88%2.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDPL achieves a -3.59% return, which is significantly lower than THLV's 6.72% return.


QDPL

1D
0.73%
1M
-3.91%
YTD
-3.59%
6M
-1.44%
1Y
16.17%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
10Y*

THLV

1D
-0.09%
1M
-4.34%
YTD
6.72%
6M
7.72%
1Y
20.34%
3Y*
11.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QDPL vs. THLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDPL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than THLV's 0.64% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QDPL vs. THLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDPL
QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

THLV
THLV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDPL vs. THLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDPLTHLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

1.81

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

2.53

-1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.34

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

3.00

-1.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.55

10.82

-4.27

QDPL vs. THLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the THLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDPL and THLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDPLTHLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

1.81

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.85

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between QDPL and THLV is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QDPL vs. THLV - Dividend Comparison

QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than THLV's 1.66% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
5.10%4.84%5.43%6.30%7.27%2.44%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
1.66%1.77%1.25%2.72%0.62%0.00%

Drawdowns

QDPL vs. THLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than THLV's maximum drawdown of -13.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and THLV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QDPLTHLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.59%

-13.15%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.94%

-6.66%

-5.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.40%

-4.46%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-3.75%

-1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

1.85%

+0.65%

Volatility

QDPL vs. THLV - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) at 3.33%. This indicates that QDPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QDPLTHLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

3.33%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

7.61%

+1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.01%

11.29%

+6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.11%

11.80%

+3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.11%

11.80%

+3.31%