QDPL vs. QDVO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO).

QDPL and QDVO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QDPL is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Jul 12, 2021. QDVO is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Aug 22, 2024.

Performance

QDPL vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QDPL vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	-4.29%	16.52%	5.54%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	-5.75%	20.16%	11.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDPL achieves a -4.29% return, which is significantly higher than QDVO's -5.75% return.

QDPL

• 1D: 2.81%
• 1M: -4.61%
• YTD: -4.29%
• 6M: -1.77%
• 1Y: 15.55%
• 3Y*: 16.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDVO

• 1D: 3.02%
• 1M: -3.55%
• YTD: -5.75%
• 6M: -3.27%
• 1Y: 20.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDPL vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDPL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.

QDPL

Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF

QDVO

Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF

Return for Risk

QDPL vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDPL

QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 58
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 69

QDVO

QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 74
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDPL vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QDPL	QDVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	1.12	-0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	1.77	-0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.25	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	2.07	-0.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	7.80	-1.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QDPL vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the QDVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDPL and QDVO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QDPL	QDVO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	1.12	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.89	-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between QDPL and QDVO is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QDPL vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, less than QDVO's 11.26% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	5.13%	4.84%	5.43%	6.30%	7.27%	2.44%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	11.26%	9.92%	2.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QDPL vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and QDVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDPL	QDVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.59%	-17.75%	-4.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.94%	-10.24%	-1.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.08%	-7.50%	+1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.30%	-2.50%	-2.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	2.71%	-0.23%

Volatility

QDPL vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) have volatilities of 5.30% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDPL	QDVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.30%	5.31%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.39%	9.74%	-0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.01%	18.60%	-0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.12%	18.02%	-2.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.12%	18.02%	-2.90%