QDPL vs. BDGS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).

QDPL and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QDPL is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Jul 12, 2021. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.

Performance

QDPL vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QDPL vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	-4.29%	16.52%	22.83%	14.98%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	-1.41%	10.61%	19.07%	8.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDPL achieves a -4.29% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's -1.41% return.

QDPL

• 1D: 2.81%
• 1M: -4.61%
• YTD: -4.29%
• 6M: -1.77%
• 1Y: 15.55%
• 3Y*: 16.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: -1.14%
• YTD: -1.41%
• 6M: 0.11%
• 1Y: 10.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDPL vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDPL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.

BDGS

Bridges Capital Tactical ETF

QDPL

Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF

Return for Risk

QDPL vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDPL

QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 58
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 69

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 73
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDPL vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QDPL	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.99	-0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	1.67	-0.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.28	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	1.80	-0.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	9.34	-2.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QDPL vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDPL and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QDPL	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	0.99	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	1.51	-0.88

Correlation

The correlation between QDPL and BDGS is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QDPL vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than BDGS's 0.56% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	5.13%	4.84%	5.43%	6.30%	7.27%	2.44%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.56%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QDPL vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDPL	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.59%	-9.12%	-13.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.94%	-5.85%	-6.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.08%	-2.15%	-3.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.30%	-0.67%	-4.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	1.13%	+1.35%

Volatility

QDPL vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 3.39%. This indicates that QDPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDPL	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.30%	3.39%	+1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.39%	5.09%	+4.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.01%	10.70%	+7.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.12%	8.35%	+6.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.12%	8.35%	+6.77%