QDEF vs. MFVL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL).

QDEF and MFVL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QDEF is a passively managed fund by FlexShares that tracks the performance of the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index. It was launched on Dec 14, 2012. MFVL is an actively managed fund by Motley Fool. It was launched on Dec 8, 2025.

Performance

QDEF vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QDEF vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund	-1.16%	0.38%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	-1.60%	1.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDEF achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's -1.60% return.

QDEF

• 1D: 2.06%
• 1M: -4.61%
• YTD: -1.16%
• 6M: 0.72%
• 1Y: 16.27%
• 3Y*: 16.97%
• 5Y*: 11.45%
• 10Y*: 11.40%

MFVL

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -5.21%
• YTD: -1.60%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDEF vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDEF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.

MFVL

Motley Fool Value Factor ETF

QDEF

FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund

Return for Risk

QDEF vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDEF

QDEF Risk / Return Rank: 68
QDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 69
QDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDEF vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QDEF	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.90	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QDEF	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	-0.07	+0.87

Correlation

The correlation between QDEF and MFVL is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QDEF vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison

QDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund	1.75%	1.74%	1.85%	2.21%	2.42%	1.84%	2.50%	3.17%	7.10%	2.70%	2.90%	3.00%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QDEF vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and MFVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDEF	MFVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.74%	-6.49%	-29.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.04%	-5.21%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.33%	-1.41%	-1.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QDEF	MFVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.58%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.72%	11.67%	+3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.83%	11.67%	+2.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.18%	11.67%	+4.51%