MFVL vs. CENX
Compare and contrast key facts about Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Century Aluminum Company (CENX).
MFVL is an actively managed fund by Motley Fool. It was launched on Dec 8, 2025.
Performance
MFVL vs. CENX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFVL vs. CENX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | -1.60% | 1.39% |
CENX Century Aluminum Company | 49.80% | 29.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than CENX's 49.80% return.
MFVL
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- -1.60%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CENX
- 1D
- 10.22%
- 1M
- 13.83%
- YTD
- 49.80%
- 6M
- 99.90%
- 1Y
- 216.22%
- 3Y*
- 80.38%
- 5Y*
- 27.75%
- 10Y*
- 23.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFVL vs. CENX — Risk / Return Rank
MFVL
CENX
MFVL vs. CENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Century Aluminum Company (CENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFVL | CENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.07 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFVL and CENX is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MFVL vs. CENX - Dividend Comparison
Neither MFVL nor CENX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
MFVL vs. CENX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -6.49%, smaller than the maximum CENX drawdown of -98.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and CENX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFVL | CENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.49% | -98.67% | +92.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -82.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -87.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.21% | -26.63% | +21.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -61.39% | +59.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.37% | — |
Volatility
MFVL vs. CENX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFVL | CENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 22.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 50.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.67% | 68.52% | -56.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.67% | 72.86% | -61.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.67% | 70.73% | -59.06% |