MFVL vs. CENX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while CENX (Century Aluminum Company) is a stock. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

MFVL vs. CENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Century Aluminum Company (CENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than CENX's 71.09% return.

MFVL

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CENX

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: 12.12%
• YTD: 71.09%
• 6M: 116.66%
• 1Y: 245.19%
• 3Y*: 98.04%
• 5Y*: 39.13%
• 10Y*: 25.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFVL vs. CENX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.39%	1.39%
CENX Century Aluminum Company	71.09%	29.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MFVL and CENX is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	-0.09

Return for Risk

MFVL vs. CENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CENX

CENX Risk / Return Rank: 96
CENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CENX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CENX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFVL vs. CENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Century Aluminum Company (CENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFVL	CENX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.08	+0.23

Drawdowns

MFVL vs. CENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum CENX drawdown of -98.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and CENX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFVL	CENX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.03%	-98.67%	+91.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-23.56%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-42.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-82.10%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-87.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.29%	-16.20%	+12.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.42%	-61.16%	+58.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.38%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MFVL	CENX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.18%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	44.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.15%	61.76%	-49.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.15%	71.95%	-59.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.15%	70.58%	-58.43%

Dividends

MFVL vs. CENX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MFVL nor CENX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFVL and CENX in my portfolio?

MFVL and CENX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.