PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBY vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBY vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBY achieves a -26.67% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 197.43% return.


QBY

1D
0.07%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-26.67%
6M
-31.10%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
3.42%
1M
21.31%
YTD
197.43%
6M
195.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBY vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QBY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF
-26.67%-8.88%
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
197.43%-0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between QBY and AMDW is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBY vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QBY vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBY vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBY drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, which is greater than AMDW's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBY and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBYAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.93%

-34.64%

-4.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.71%

0.00%

-33.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-14.28%

-11.68%

Volatility

QBY vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBYAMDWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.87%

83.18%

-51.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.87%

83.18%

-51.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.87%

83.18%

-51.31%

QBY vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBY vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

QBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 114.26%, more than AMDW's 34.46% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
34.46%34.78%
QBY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF
114.26%15.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


QBY and AMDW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QBY.

QBY has the higher dividend yield at 114.26%, compared with 34.46% for AMDW.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QBY and 0.99% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBY and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer