QB vs. SQQQ
QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - QB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Nasdaq-100, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.82, they often move in opposite directions. QB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
QB vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QB achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -40.31% return.
QB
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SQQQ
- 1D
- 9.83%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -40.31%
- 6M
- -37.80%
- 1Y
- -61.11%
- 3Y*
- -53.86%
- 5Y*
- -46.89%
- 10Y*
- -56.24%
QB vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 9.56% | 6.10% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -40.31% | -31.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between QB and SQQQ is -0.82, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | -0.82 |
QB vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QB
SQQQ
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QB
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
QB
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
QB
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
QB
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
QB
SQQQ
-
Industrials
QB
SQQQ
-
Utilities
QB
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
QB
SQQQ
-
Energy
QB
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
QB
SQQQ
Real Estate
QB
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QB vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
QB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SQQQ
QB vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QB | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.78 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QB vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QB drawdown since its inception was -3.47%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QB and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QB | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -100.00% | +96.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -63.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -92.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -97.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -100.00% | +98.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.41% | -92.73% | +92.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 36.37% | — |
Volatility
QB vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QB | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 26.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 43.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.85% | 53.65% | -46.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.85% | 67.53% | -60.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.85% | 66.47% | -59.62% |
QB vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
QB vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than SQQQ's 11.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 0.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 11.44% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QB and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.44%, compared with 0.63% for QB.
QB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. QB tracks Nasdaq-100, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QB and 0.95% for SQQQ.
Find the right allocation for QB and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer