QB vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Nasdaq-100, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

QB vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QB achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 7.88% return.

QB

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.97%
• 1Y: 23.93%
• 3Y*: 13.80%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 9.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QB vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	10.47%	5.77%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.88%	12.56%

Correlation

The correlation between QB and QYLD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.67

QB vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QB	QYLD
Technology	49.9%	53.8%
Communication Services	16.4%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	8.6%	7.7%
Healthcare	5.3%	4.2%
Industrials	3.7%	2.8%
Utilities	1.6%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.3%	1.1%
Energy	0.6%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QB vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QB vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QB	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.17	0.59	+2.58

Drawdowns

QB vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QB drawdown since its inception was -1.83%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QB and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	QB	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.83%	-24.75%	+22.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.97%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-0.06%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.34%	-3.84%	+3.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QB	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.75%	8.58%	-2.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.75%	14.70%	-8.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.75%	15.49%	-9.74%

QB vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QB vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.62%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.46%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QB and QYLD in my portfolio?

QB and QYLD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QB or QYLD?

On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QB or QYLD?

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QB or QYLD?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 0.62% for QB.

What is the main difference between QB and QYLD?

QB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. QB tracks Nasdaq-100, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QB and 0.60% for QYLD.