QAI vs. ATTR
QAI (NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF) and ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) are both Long-Short funds. QAI is passively managed, while ATTR is actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QAI charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for ATTR.
Performance
QAI vs. ATTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QAI achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly higher than ATTR's 4.46% return.
QAI
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 13.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.01%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- 3.85%
ATTR
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- 4.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QAI vs. ATTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QAI NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 7.94% | -0.05% |
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 4.46% | 0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between QAI and ATTR is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QAI vs. ATTR — Risk / Return Rank
QAI
ATTR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QAI vs. ATTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QAI | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.38 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QAI vs. ATTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QAI drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, which is greater than ATTR's maximum drawdown of -1.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAI and ATTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QAI | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | -1.76% | -13.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -0.13% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -0.24% | -2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | — | — |
Volatility
QAI vs. ATTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QAI | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.71% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.73% | 3.22% | +3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.70% | 3.22% | +3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.24% | 3.22% | +3.02% |
QAI vs. ATTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ATTR's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
QAI vs. ATTR - Dividend Comparison
QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, while ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QAI NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 1.39% | 1.50% | 2.22% | 4.08% | 2.00% | 0.28% | 1.98% | 1.91% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QAI and ATTR have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QAI.
QAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.
They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Arin Risk Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QAI and 0.63% for ATTR.
Find the right allocation for QAI and ATTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer