QAI vs. MNA
Compare and contrast key facts about IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA).
QAI and MNA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QAI is a passively managed fund by New York Life that tracks the performance of the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. MNA is a passively managed fund by New York Life that tracks the performance of the IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. It was launched on Nov 17, 2009. Both QAI and MNA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QAI or MNA.
Correlation
The correlation between QAI and MNA is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
QAI vs. MNA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QAI:
1.82
MNA:
1.63
QAI:
2.58
MNA:
2.36
QAI:
1.33
MNA:
1.31
QAI:
2.67
MNA:
0.85
QAI:
10.84
MNA:
7.63
QAI:
0.85%
MNA:
0.88%
QAI:
5.07%
MNA:
4.10%
QAI:
-14.95%
MNA:
-16.68%
QAI:
-0.40%
MNA:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QAI achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than MNA's 1.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QAI having a 2.24% annualized return and MNA not far behind at 2.18%.
QAI
1.50%
1.43%
4.02%
8.84%
2.71%
2.24%
MNA
1.58%
1.86%
4.43%
7.10%
0.79%
2.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QAI vs. MNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MNA's 0.77% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QAI vs. MNA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
QAI
MNA
QAI vs. MNA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QAI vs. MNA - Dividend Comparison
QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, while MNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 2.19% | 2.23% | 4.08% | 2.00% | 0.28% | 1.98% | 1.91% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.48% | 1.34% |
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.87% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QAI vs. MNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QAI drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum MNA drawdown of -16.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAI and MNA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QAI vs. MNA - Volatility Comparison
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) has a higher volatility of 1.65% compared to IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) at 0.94%. This indicates that QAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.